my monster hunter tri thread jus died
dam 95 days
5 off

good game

its actually my second or third favorite out of the 4 in the series



and its actually hard, they have the time trials which are nearly impossible and temple levels are challenging


also has a good soundtrack like the snes ones well not as good as 2's

its everyones 2nd or third favorite in the series, the 3rd one was just bad

well idk, I saw some videos and reviews some time ago and I just remember it seeming a bit easy, but ofc it wasn't really enough to draw conclusions about it, so I'm probably mistaken about this

I'm glad to hear it's actually hard, I'd really like to play it someday. I'm not realy fond of some of the changes and new features I've seen it has, but it still seems like a fun game.

And it's good to hear the soundtrack is good, although I can't expect it to be as good as the ones from the SNES games as it lacks David Wise

I don't think it was bad, it was just badly hurt by the N64 coming out at the same time imo

It was a bit different from the first two, adding new concepts (some good, some bad), but I honestly still enjoyed it

The bad side was that it lacked the atmosphere of the first two, the "baddies" were given a different (not good) look, and Kiddy Kong simply wasn't an appealing character

This post was edited by zarkadon on May 28 2012 07:21am

i love the 3rd, its definitely not bad imo

was bad compared to the other ones ofc

worse than 2 overall

worse in style and concept than 1, but superior to 1 in other areas... DKC1 was a bit of a primitive game, it lacked many features 2&3 had (DK coins, bonus coins, special world, team work, etc)

so considering when the games were released I'd say 1>3, but other than that I have trouble saying whch one is better

i dont

1>3 by a very long shot
collectibles doesnt make a good game