d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Other Games > Consoles > Sony > For Those F*ckers Who Said I Was A Camper And > Non-objective Player.
Prev111121314Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 2530Replies: 137Track Topic
Member
Posts: 25,117
Joined: Jun 17 2009
Gold: 6.10
#121
Sep 11 2011 05:28am
Quote (Anthraxinsoup @ Sep 11 2011 07:06am)
Unlocked i5? you mean 2500k? That's unlocked multi. Also, The DX11 lacked DX11, High res, AA, and the textures. DX11 alone is a system raper, as is AA and textures. Also, you have a 570 not a 460, so it's invalid that you got 60FPS. They said 2x580s is needed for 2560x1600, 1600 will require 1.2 580s or so.


people started waking up, talked to a few peeps but im back now


the yeah 2500k
3.3 i do believe it is.

me getting constant 60 with mine, then a card like 2 below not being able to run it at all? lol

and where have you seen the 1600x1200 reqs? i havent seen any mention of specifics.

also, the trailers were all done with a single 580. and the 580 is about 10% better than the 570. probably will have to cut it at 8x AA, but no serious cut backs on things ill notice.
Member
Posts: 12,617
Joined: Jan 26 2010
Gold: 320.52
Warn: 60%
#122
Sep 11 2011 05:30am
Quote (Buffjesus @ 11 Sep 2011 04:28)
people started waking up, talked to a few peeps but im back now


the yeah 2500k
3.3 i do believe it is.

me getting constant 60 with mine, then a card like 2 below not being able to run it at all? lol

and where have you seen the 1600x1200 reqs? i havent seen any mention of specifics.

also, the trailers were all done with a single 580. and the 580 is about 10% better than the 570. probably will have to cut it at 8x AA, but no serious cut backs on things ill notice.


2560x1600, not 1600x1200. Also, that's without DX11, Highres textures, or AA. AA cuts frames down by a lot, DX11 will cut them down by like half. Your 570 will barely handle it. The full game needs like 2x570s. Look at the proof I posted. Also, 3.3GHz on a 2500k? That's useless! Overclock or GTFO.
Member
Posts: 21,527
Joined: Jan 15 2009
Gold: 0.00
#123
Sep 11 2011 05:32am
Quote (Buffjesus @ Sep 11 2011 06:28am)
people started waking up, talked to a few peeps but im back now


the yeah 2500k
3.3 i do believe it is.

me getting constant 60 with mine, then a card like 2 below not being able to run it at all? lol

and where have you seen the 1600x1200 reqs? i havent seen any mention of specifics.

also, the trailers were all done with a single 580. and the 580 is about 10% better than the 570. probably will have to cut it at 8x AA, but no serious cut backs on things ill notice.


He edited at 6:08 and you posted at 6:28. You quoted him 20 minutes ago then googled some answers?
Member
Posts: 12,617
Joined: Jan 26 2010
Gold: 320.52
Warn: 60%
#124
Sep 11 2011 05:33am
Quote (WolfOfHonor @ 11 Sep 2011 04:32)
He edited at 6:08 and you posted at 6:28. You quoted him 20 minutes ago then googled some answers?


He also dodged my proof.
Member
Posts: 25,117
Joined: Jun 17 2009
Gold: 6.10
#125
Sep 11 2011 05:36am
Quote (Anthraxinsoup @ Sep 11 2011 07:30am)
2560x1600, not 1600x1200. Also, that's without DX11, Highres textures, or AA. AA cuts frames down by a lot, DX11 will cut them down by like half. Your 570 will barely handle it. The full game needs like 2x570s. Look at the proof I posted. Also, 3.3GHz on a 2500k? That's useless! Overclock or GTFO.


crysis 2 came out with their dx11
and my computer still shit on it at max


i dont see how bf3 will cripple it.


Quote (WolfOfHonor @ Sep 11 2011 07:32am)
He edited at 6:08 and you posted at 6:28. You quoted him 20 minutes ago then googled some answers?


i quoted him
typed out 3 words
got out of my chair
talked to people
sat down
finished answer
hit reply

that hard to figure out or something?

This post was edited by Buffjesus on Sep 11 2011 05:38am
Member
Posts: 12,617
Joined: Jan 26 2010
Gold: 320.52
Warn: 60%
#126
Sep 11 2011 05:37am
Quote (Buffjesus @ 11 Sep 2011 04:36)
crysis 2 came out with their dx11
and my computer still shit on it at max


i dont see how bf3 will cripple it.


That's cause Crysis 2 is a POS. The game looks terribad, seriously, terribad. They only have DX11 running good cause the textures are so shitty looking. DX11 and AA will cut frames in more than half. Go look at the proof I posted. A 285=460
A 480=Better than your 570 in FPS and CFC.
Member
Posts: 25,117
Joined: Jun 17 2009
Gold: 6.10
#127
Sep 11 2011 05:42am
Quote (Anthraxinsoup @ Sep 11 2011 07:37am)
That's cause Crysis 2 is a POS. The game looks terribad, seriously, terribad. They only have DX11 running good cause the textures are so shitty looking. DX11 and AA will cut frames in more than half. Go look at the proof I posted. A 285=460
A 480=Better than your 570 in FPS and CFC.


a 480 is 2% worse than a 570?


and yeah the 460 is bad i know, but it could still run it no problem.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStrNxFJADE

???? he seems to be running it

This post was edited by Buffjesus on Sep 11 2011 05:45am
Member
Posts: 12,617
Joined: Jan 26 2010
Gold: 320.52
Warn: 60%
#128
Sep 11 2011 05:43am
Quote (Buffjesus @ 11 Sep 2011 04:42)
a 480 is 2% worse than a 570?


and yeah the 460 is bad i know, but it could still run it no problem.


No it couldn't It gets like 45AVG in the alpha without all those. Also, no a 480 isn't worse than your 570 at all. It overclocks much higher, and it is faster clock for clock, and seeing as a 480 can go upto like 100MHz higher without a voltage bumb, that less than a 100MHz gap can easily be filled.

Edit:

Resolution: 1366x768 = Fail! but i'm getting a new monitor soon...
Graphics: High = Maxed
Anti-Aliasing: There wasn't an option for it..
FPS: 45-60 - Very fucking smooth even for a pre-alpha!

1366x768 and he is only getting 45-60FPS. That's terribad. 1366x768 is a POS low res, and 45FPS is terribad.

This post was edited by Anthraxinsoup on Sep 11 2011 05:45am
Member
Posts: 12,617
Joined: Jan 26 2010
Gold: 320.52
Warn: 60%
#129
Sep 11 2011 05:47am
HURR! GUYS! 768 IS MAX RES! SO HIGH! HURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!

Stop dodging proof.

This post was edited by Anthraxinsoup on Sep 11 2011 05:47am
Member
Posts: 25,117
Joined: Jun 17 2009
Gold: 6.10
#130
Sep 11 2011 05:52am
Quote (Anthraxinsoup @ Sep 11 2011 07:43am)
No it couldn't It gets like 45AVG in the alpha without all those. Also, no a 480 isn't worse than your 570 at all. It overclocks much higher, and it is faster clock for clock, and seeing as a 480 can go upto like 100MHz higher without a voltage bumb, that less than a 100MHz gap can easily be filled.

Edit:

Resolution: 1366x768 = Fail! but i'm getting a new monitor soon...
Graphics: High = Maxed
Anti-Aliasing: There wasn't an option for it..
FPS: 45-60 - Very fucking smooth even for a pre-alpha!

1366x768 and he is only getting 45-60FPS. That's terribad. 1366x768 is a POS low res, and 45FPS is terribad.


weve gone from

Quote (Anthraxinsoup @ Sep 11 2011 06:44am)
Rift runs about 260FPS on my 6970s in CF at max. Also, those aren't the ultra setting requirements. Also, requirements=/=running good. A 460 couldn't run the alpha which had no AA nor DX11, nor the high textures, at 60FPS. Good job there. Also, what CPU, huh?


to okay he can run it.
good we agree. a 460 can run the alpha.




edit: also what proof? that the 460 is bad? is that one of things from what we were discussing and something i already knew as i confirmed in this post

Quote (Buffjesus @ Sep 11 2011 07:42am)
a 480 is 2% worse than a 570?


and yeah the 460 is bad i know, but it could still run it no problem.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rStrNxFJADE

???? he seems to be running it


This post was edited by Buffjesus on Sep 11 2011 05:55am
Go Back To Sony Topic List
Prev111121314Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact