Quote (dragoneth @ Nov 13 2011 04:22pm)
i palyed the gmaes n saw the pp lflying around unlmited ammo etc etc on cod4 mw2 has hacked lobbies etc etc dont tell me there not hacked
and why do u say that only cod gets good palyers? im sure theres "super skilled fps pros" that just simply dont like cod so they dont play it
quit acting like cod is competetive and bf is only casual nobody good plays .. shit how can u be competetive with laggy user hosted games?
I guarantee I played more than you and never saw a flying person. There were a few hacked lobbies in mw2 but they were RARE. You probably had MW1 and that's it. I don't believe you spent significant time on any cod.
I said bf3 doesn't bring in good players, I didn't say only cod brings in good players. Nice community college comprehension.
Here's an idea, if every game you joined was laggy maybe it was YOUR KMART CONNECTION. I join little lag to lag-free games all the time. COD is competitive and good players don't play bf3 lol.
Now do your usual and forget/misread everything I said.
Quote (destry @ Nov 13 2011 04:24pm)
most people dont compete though you cant base your definiton of casual solely on the competitive aspect of the game because only a minority plays in tournaments and such
im just talking about when you pick up the game, someone who's not familliar with fps would have an easier time picking up MW3 than bf3 imo
its not a bad thing anyway
I said cod was casual/competitive meaning it appeals to both communities. Casual games are games people don't compete at... my definition is valid.
I disagree. MW3 has a better average skill simply by having a competitive community. They bring in better players and then the better players therefore level up the shitty players' skill quicker. I know plenty of people who don't play shooters and only have a 0.5k/d in cod lol.
This post was edited by axshen on Nov 13 2011 03:32pm