Quote (xXDarkNinjaXx @ Oct 3 2011 12:15pm)

i lol'd...
+ the beta will not be like the actual game
beta = bad graphics
game = 100 times better graphics

beta = no vehicles
game = sexy vehicles

beta = glitches
game = no glitches

beta = one map and game
game = more maps and more games

and i could go on...seriously

Quote (Fallen619 @ Oct 3 2011 11:22am)

Butt hurt cuz u suck? A pity. Who wants to play? I'll be on in a bit.

Quote (jshawn89 @ Oct 3 2011 12:31pm)

This thread is full of fail.


All your points sound like a personal problem. It's like me not being good at Starcraft 2 at all and saying it sucks because I keep getting buttfucked.

the game will not have glitches. maybe for first 1 or even 2 weeks it will before it gets patched. Look at BC2 as an example, it's perfect. No glitches or anything.

DICE cares about their games unlike majority of other devs.

Quote (bongtokess @ Oct 3 2011 09:03am)

First things first, understand that I usually don't like FPS games.
I really like in-depth RPG games and RTS on PC.

Specifically, why I didn't like BF3 was because:

I found it hard to aim. I found myself just starting out, didn't have a scope and was getting picked off easily because at best I could look down the rails.
I understand that they are going for a more realistic look with larger maps and less of a run'n'gun feel but in my opinion they are in the grey area where it is almost too realistic.
In real life, there would be snipers in obscure locations just picking people off. Which at times was what it felt like. Doesn't make a fun game in my opinion.

I have played COD before but this is the only comparrison I am going to make but if in this large map I am getting sniped from someone laying prone in an obscure location, give me a killcam so that he can't just camp there and I can exact revenge.
Again, grey area of realism.

Sime things I really liked though was the polish. The game itself looks amazing.
The objection based mode in the beta was fun too.
But, still not enough to sway myself into FPS.
Remember, this is just my opinion. Just trying to break up all the BF3 praise with some contrast.

Quote (bloodyaeon2 @ Oct 3 2011 12:39pm)

sniper lens glare
and not minimal glare
its like shining a flash light in pitch dark glare

Quote (bongtokess @ Oct 3 2011 10:41am)

Yeah, I noticed that. Thought it was pretty cool. Lol, at first I was like OMG what the hell is that! Kind of took me by surprise. I like that idea.

Quote (bongtokess @ Oct 3 2011 11:03am)

First things first, understand that I usually don't like FPS games.
I really like in-depth RPG games and RTS on PC.

Specifically, why I didn't like BF3 was because:

I found it hard to aim. I found myself just starting out, didn't have a scope and was getting picked off easily because at best I could look down the rails.
I understand that they are going for a more realistic look with larger maps and less of a run'n'gun feel but in my opinion they are in the grey area where it is almost too realistic.
In real life, there would be snipers in obscure locations just picking people off. Which at times was what it felt like. Doesn't make a fun game in my opinion.

I have played COD before but this is the only comparrison I am going to make but if in this large map I am getting sniped from someone laying prone in an obscure location, give me a killcam so that he can't just camp there and I can exact revenge.
Again, grey area of realism.

Sime things I really liked though was the polish. The game itself looks amazing.
The objection based mode in the beta was fun too.
But, still not enough to sway myself into FPS.
Remember, this is just my opinion. Just trying to break up all the BF3 praise with some contrast.