Heard it's going to be good.



"On PS4, we see the same 1600x900 native rendering resolution and identical post-process anti-aliasing, along with a performance profile that's similar - perhaps possibly worse - than its DICE stablemate's."

"General action sees us sees vary wildly between 40-60fps - with sudden fluctuations in frame-time giving a disjointed, judder-filled gameplay experience - definitely more than just a visual issue, as controller response definitely feels muggier when the engine is under stress. "

"In both cases, the impact to performance is substantial, with frame-rates dropping down to a minimum of 30fps."

"If you look at the games that Visceral Games has made before, we have always striven for total parity between our platforms," creative director Ian Milham told Gaming Bolt, though it's worth pointing out that he does not specifically address exact resolution or frame-rate. "Of course, the PC version, it will do whatever your PC can handle, and the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 versions will obviously not be as high res as compared to the PlayStation 4 and Xbox One versions. But those two [PS4 and Xbox One] should be locked in together."

loved bf3
hated bf4
sluggish controls

Juddering at 40 FPS is caused by the TV, not the FPS. We need better TV's.

#thisiswhatsonyggersactuallybelieve

They believe it because it's true. Refresh rate is locked while FPS is variable, causes juddering.
Google G Sync Technology, learn yourself something new.

This post was edited by ROM on Jun 13 2014 08:13am

So a game that was said to be running at 60fps, but actually runs between 30-60fps is the TVs problem?

well it is a beta so not being fully optimized should be expected

how much did the video card on your pc cost ya to play it at 60fps?



that too.. look at bf4 beta they lost preorders cuz that shit was so screwy

This post was edited by dragoneth on Jun 13 2014 03:47pm

bf3 beta was terrible.

Game was meh. I wouldn't even worry about it.