Quote
Once again, PC gamer are left with another ported game from another PC company that us PC gamer help started. The PC version has clunky control, and graphics could be so much better. The reason why it was not ported over to console instead of the other way around is because of you guys. You 360 and PS3 owners are the reason why us PC gamer have been suffering. To describes my point more vividly, console gamer are casual folk who do not care enough about games and gaming to invest their time and money in perusing the ultimate experience. Why does someone who put time in building his or her PC and money saved from work get a dumb down console version port? Is it even fair? Not to mention the outcry of the recent trend of $60 dollars game for the PC? PC games have no licensing.
The game is fun, thus I gave it a 5 star review, and won't let my own personal sentiment ruin the score on Amazon. I gave the game a 3 overall because of the graphics and clunky PC control. I wrote my feeling on the 360 page because this game was made for the 360, and I want to let you guys know that all your enjoyment is not free, it is at the cost of the true hardcore PC gamer.
Does this now make me a hypocrite for owning both a PS3 and a 360? No, it does not because majority of console games are exclusive while PC games are not exclusive. Maybe it would be less painful had pc gamer got more games from console to PC, but that doesn't seem to be the case. While you may hate my guts for spilling out what I feel is off tremendous importance, I am not the person at fault here. This is a double standard and that console gamer get the upper-hand. Then I ask you, who is the real hypocrite?