I won't object personally (not that it would matter much if I did).
After writing it couple of times and when you have memorized the spelling by heart,word"atheist" wouldn't give you any trouble.Till then a "non believer "would cover it's meaning approximately.
can you teach me away from the computer my beliefe this is the matrix much darkness and dont want to be here in the first place
seems all time tv radir etc is centered on the last supper ive been nk
must be many things like tape recoders or something satelite all sorts with one voice i know of society i see paper work how he braught the future here i dont know but he is no harm really a promise of goodness for favors on material things being responsible for their actions -2*-2= p=pope
Why not simply call them atheists? "Non believers' is largely a meaningless phrase. For instance to a Christian, a Hindu would be a 'non believer'. If you aren't specifying which group of 'non believers' you are referring to then what is the point of using the phrase? And what is with nouns giving you headaches? Perhaps you should see a doctor.
Well, "non-believers" isn't the best choice of term for a couple of reasons. One, its lack of specificity as to what we don't believe in implies that your belief is the only alternative. Two, it's not at all descriptive, since you'd be able to call the believers of every other religion "non-believers" in terms of your religion...you, yourself, are a "non-believer" in hundreds of other religions, too.
So while "non-believers" isn't insulting, atheist is the better term to use, here, because it is more specific.