We will now see how we can defend ourselves against a threat.
In general, it only takes
a step back.
I recoil, and the person in front of me understands that I feel threatened.
In general, the interlocutor will calm things down, and he will become calmer.
Why?
How can a simple recoil move be so powerful?
A recoil motion may be associated with an explanation.
By backing up, it's as if I'm explaining to the other that I find him threatening.
Despair is a misfortune very rare in today's society.
Few people are able to betray.
To betray the other is to expose oneself to despair.
Very few people are capable of it.
Sometimes it's not enough to have a recoil.
This is especially true when the person in front of us is a
"mortof", that is to say, a consciously ill-intentioned person.
A
"mortof" is a malicious person, consciously.
What to do in these cases?
I will tell you an anecdote.
at university, I have a teacher who has a strong tendency to be threatening.
One day, this teacher was teaching in a classroom, as it happens often.
Most of the teachers stay close to the board, to skip the slide show, to be heard, to write on the board, or to point to certain items that appear on the screen.
Usually, this teacher also tends to stay close to the board.
But that day, the teacher broke off in the middle of his class and walked down the hall between the tables.
The students were rather sleepy, and most students did not pay close attention to this attitude.
Me, I was at the back left (far from the board) of the classroom.
I saw the classroom in my right visual field, and that was going back to my left hemisphere.
I had a friend, a Muslim, who was at the back right of the classroom.
He saw the class in his left visual field.
There were three Catholic boys right behind me (one of them was my friend).
There were two corridors in the room: one on the left, the other on the right.
The professor was coming up the left lane, and he was approaching me.
At first, I did not pay much attention to his strange behavior.
But the closer he got to me, the more it bothered me.
My gaze followed the professor's movement until I caught the eye of my Muslim friend, who was at the far right of the room.
That's when I really suspected the teacher of doing
"tmenyek".
In the middle of the class, the teacher pretends to be disturbed by a bag in the middle of a deserted alley.
Why?
The teacher does
"tmenyek", that is to say he exaggerates: he gives importance to unimportant things.
He tries to have an angle of attack.
He tries to accomplish things
"à l'embrouille" (in chaos and confusion).
Catholics can be very threatening and dangerous.
They are messing around (ils cafouillent).
They are messing around, again and again.
They are messing around.
And suddely, they try to accomplish things in chaos and confusion.
That makes Catholics threatening and dangerous.
My great-grandfather was a Catholic.
I am not saying bad things about Catholics.
I am making a reproach that seems to me legitimate and relevant.
How did the story end?
I put pressure on my teacher.
I scanned him, analyzed each of his smaller movements.
Because I knew it was dishonest what he was doing.
I was able to defend myself thanks to my muslim friend.
It's my muslim friend who permitted me to defend myself well.
His attitude a little panicked allowed me to have the correct attitude.
In Arabic, put the pressure, it's called
"balek".
Sometimes, my grandfather says
"balek" to my grandmother, if she takes risks (for example, if she brutally unmolds a caramel
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flan).
In conclusion, I have three things to say:
- Thank you, Tahir.
Thank you for being my friend.
Thank you for helping me defend myself against a very real threat, in France, in 2016.
Thank you for helping me to stop this threatening teacher from accomplishing bad things in chaos and confusion.
- When you have a culture related to reason, you have to sit to the right of the classroom.
It's when you're on the right side of the classroom that you're strong.
To the left of the classroom, those who have an intelligence of emotions are the strongest.
For Muslims and Jews to be strong, they must have images in their left field of vision.
- It seems to me that this anecdote testifies to the fact that Jews have an intelligence by precision, and Muslims have an intelligence by approximation.
This post was edited by Chevaucheur on Feb 23 2018 08:46am