d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > User Blogs > Thought Journal
Prev123
Add Reply New Topic
Member
Posts: 22,432
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 106.11
Nov 26 2023 11:27pm
The sense of smell is the TSA of the nose.
Member
Posts: 22,432
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 106.11
Nov 27 2023 12:23am
Donald Hoffman's and Anil Seth ideas regarding the perception of 'reality' seem quite compelling, the idea that we have a controlled hallucination of reality rather than experiencing 100% of base reality. To explore this idea:

Are bats conscious?

Do bats experience reality?

Is their experience of reality different than human's in a meaningful way via their having the sense of echolocation? Wouldn't "reality" look extremely different from a bat's point of view? I think so, but that disparity of difference can be understood through the controlled hallucination hypothesis.
Member
Posts: 22,432
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 106.11
Dec 2 2023 11:50pm
There exists a non-spiritual, physics-based argument for the phenomenon of non-duality and the philosophy thereof. Given that humanity is a heterotroph, and that we subsequently are a conscious form of energy that can only exist by the consumption of either conscious or non-conscious (as far as we can reasonably assume, at this time) energy. This means that we are both a sense of self that is connected to a larger one-ness--that of a finite amount of energy in the known universe consuming itself, that did so via the process of evolution to the point of becoming conscious.

If energy has a 'death', then isn't it also the case that 'energy' is subject to the adaptive limitations of mortality (aka 'evolution')?
Member
Posts: 22,432
Joined: Mar 3 2007
Gold: 106.11
Dec 3 2023 12:12am
Humans are heterotrophic, so we consume energy rather than produce our energy from some non-conscious energy consumption (autotrophic). This has led humanity to, not necessarily by a species-wide vote, be a violent species. Because there's a certain violence to being a heterotroph in a universe now inhabited by conscious life that is capable of suffering and extinction.

So could it not be argued, from an ethical standpoint (akin to the kind invoked for pro-vegan arguments), that if humanity could collaborate to influence the arc of the evolution of consciousness, wouldn't we went to evolve consciousness into a autotrophic evolutionary timeline (IE: The invention of Artificial General Intelligence)?
Go Back To User Blogs Topic List
Prev123
Add Reply New Topic