Recently got into journaling, but I write too slowly for it to be a strategy for reflecting on all the thoughts I find myself having--particularly those that are both fleeting and wheel-turning. As such, I thought this blog could be a space for me to document on some of those thoughts for my future reflection. These are just the thoughts of 1 human out of billions.
10/02/2022
I'm a far-left person, politically speaking, but averse to identifying with anything beyond that as I personally think identifying with a specific identity or political group often results in the propensity for groupthink to form and a lack of empathy-driven conversations when interacting with people who are not a part of the same group identity. Recently then, I've been reflecting on the short-comings and issues within the modern American left lately in the hopes that I can at least incorporate my own reflections in my conversations with people whom hold socio-political views that are very different than, if not outright opposed to, my own.
One such example has been in watching conversations with people on the left on the topic of abortion. There seems to be a hesitancy to answer the question "When does life begin?" that is earnestly asked by those on the right / pro-life individuals. I can, on one hand, understand the hesitancy because it is a big biological and philosophical question that may require a certain amount of hubris to state that life begins at X with utter confidence. At the same time, I think that it is reasonable and okay to have an opinion on the matter because certainly life does not come into existence spontaneously--and for this reason, I think the left would benefit from just answering that question outright. I disagree that life begins at fertilization/conception as pro-life people often suggest, because I don't think the elementary, base conditions to allow for the development of life to form from fertilization alone. Further, I think the most logical, apolitical answer is that life begins at implantation. While a whole host of things can happen that can result in miscarriage as further variables will need to be ensured for development to continue (ie. enough nutrition to sustain both the life of the parent and the child), the absolute minimum variables needed would be the process of successful implantation. Consequently, I find it frustrating that oftentimes people who are pro-choice (as I myself am) will avoid this question or feel that somehow 'conceding' that a fetus is a manifestation of life somehow invalidates the pro-choice argument. Personally, I think both the parent and the unborn fetus are life, and the reason why this topic of abortion is so complicated is because there are two lives co-existing with respect to physical space. The pro-life argument makes sense to me, in terms of understanding or empathizing with it, and yet I still am myself pro-choice because I think the argument necessitates that someone's rights will be infringed no matter the outcome of the abortion debate, and whether people end up on the pro-life or pro-choice side is likely the result of their deep-seated values rather than anything nefarious. If conversations were approached from that lens more often, I think we'd have much more civil and productive conversations about abortion.