Humongous....ginormous....infinite.....whatever! Since this will probably never get 75% or more to vote yes this thread is invalid and might as well become closed!




Tl;didn’t really understand, so probably no

This post was edited by CARTRACK on Oct 7 2018 02:13am

Since Paul has made it abundantly clear that he does not care for feedback and is building the game the way he wants all suggestion threads should be closed no matter what % of the players think.

This is incorrect because I have seen some suggestions become implemented. But I highly doubt this will become one of them

Yes, I just wrote an alternative solution to this post which is easier to implement.
You can add 10-12 items with its own price (combined to be 22k), the fee will be taken for each item, like it is now. You just have to trust the buyer that will buy all the items.

But, I didnt said is a good solution as this will distroy the concept of guild transfer.
I didnt vote yet as Im not sure.

Thus you don't really comprehend the initial suggestion either, especially if you can not understand, why do you bother to post at all.



Then that is the difference... individual sale price with a fee vs a package deal @ a set price and the fee is only once removed... Thing is this, if individual items had their OWN price/fees, then a buyer can IGNORE items they do not need in the package deal, thus making trade bins in trade forum abused.

There are items in a package deal that I want, but only 3 out of 10 items because I have better items, so, when it is put on marketplace as a so called package deal, and individual prices are instituted, then I can forego the other 7 items and ONLY buy the 3 items I am interested, so, the trader loses out on fees.

I think it needs more thought... but that is my opinion... I still like your idea, I just don't agree that individual items have fees when package deals are set as 1 price and the fee is applied to taking the whole package and not abused.

I understood it and voted no. Clearly I am not the only one! But keep throwing your opinions out on this matter and perhaps others will agree with you.

Yes, but do you believe he picks those selections based on popular opinion or because he personally likes them? Thus if any stay open, all deserve to. However I’d guess the overall percentage of ideas implemented is very small and considering you’ve probably only been around for one of Paul’s patches I doubt you’ve seen too many implemented.

On the flip side there have been plenty of suggestions in here that have been taken the wrong way by Paul and then removed completely, so one could argue that these suggestions are more destructive than constructive.

Or one could argue that any suggestion that Pail has actually implemented could thus be considered constructive and had it not been suggested then perhaps would have never been implemented.

This post was edited by CARTRACK on Oct 7 2018 09:15am

And so you agree that all have merit and should be allowed to run their course whether they are popular amoungst the community or not. Therefore this should not be closed because it does not meet some random 75% threshold that you deem worthy.

Again I’d argue that the percentage of accepted ideas is so small that it is negligible, and you’d say you’ve seen millions of ideas implemented in the half of a year/1 update or so you’ve been playing.

You must have been around for a long time to see idea implemented, but your acct is pretty new. Weird.. or not.