Quote (Gearic @ Dec 23 2018 03:20am)
I haven't suggested any more strongly than you have that I can read minds, or speak for anyone other than myself. The only difference between our assertions, is that mine isn't based on an assumption that disagreeing with me suggests a level of incompetence. Oh, and mine also didn't sound like a rant from Happy Noodle Boy.
Oh, wait some more!
Oh, look, turns out that you DID say, without caveat, what it is that other people think. So, you're just a hypocrite.
I get that people want reasons for no votes. That's totally fine. I'm happy to see the viewpoints of those with differing opinions, especially when those viewpoints are convincing and encourage real thought on the matter. So, when you want to take the time to actually articulate your point in a thoughtful manner, with specific points to discuss, then maybe you can contribute something useful (something more than #popcorn, that is).
Actually, I was the last to post when you quoted me, (now read your own words carefully)
Quote (Gearic @ Dec 22 2018 03:43pm)
Or ... maybe ... yes voters have considered these things, and simply disagree with your idea that all of these trickle down effects are necessarily bad.
By your quote, you state that "yes" voters have considered (or... maybe) these things and simply disagree with your idea etc... problem is, you are the only one that posted a reply after my post.
Yup... you lost a simple one there bud... go back to the drawing board, you may have something clever to say.