Sure:

Polearm average dmg 334

Sword average dmg 223


Polearm hits once when sword hits twice so:

Polearm average dmg per second 167
Sword average dmg per second 223


Crits ampilifier is the same for all weapons so has no influence in statistics.

Why is this thread still going? I see 6 pages of the same thing. The sword has a higher avg dmg because of 1 hits per second.

This post was edited by Massivelybored on Jan 14 2010 03:52pm

Prove it.

[its 1 hit per sec not 2]

This post was edited by Adversary on Jan 14 2010 03:52pm

you are seriously getting annoying as hell

cuz ur polearm only does 1 hit every 2 sec

i hit twice, i have 180 ee
you hit once you have 118 ee but double dmg,

but as you attack TWICE as slow, i will be hitting 2 times, while you'll only be hitting once, and therefore i will do more dmg cuz the sword has 180 ee, which is more than 118 ee

explained enough?


i srsly think you're jokin

This post was edited by Salaki on Jan 14 2010 03:59pm

You guys are only thinking the speed... How about we ignore the speed and think about the average damage?

Because you asked which was better, and by asking that, you CAN NOT IGNORE SPEED BECAUSE THEY ARE DIFFERENT.

/topic

Ok we wont ignore it. Lets get the average damage and see
thats all I am asking. I would like this be compared

Of course the avg. damage on the polearm would be better. That's why Paul created the speed factor......

The sword is better. Can't believe this topic made it to 15 pages.

omfg we did compare it. for 15 pages. WE GET IT YOUR POLEARM DOES MORE DAMAGE THAN A SWORD

but the sword is still better

This post was edited by FloppyWaffles on Jan 14 2010 05:26pm