But he’s right?

Did you read the first sentence of my post?



#1 Resetting Ladder ... you don't have gear... well then you better be ready for never completing this task.
#2 SC and death farming @ level 60 is a great option, but then what if the player is playing Hardcore for Gear or FG?
#4 People re-rolling character means they are after Prof points, gear hunting or finding items to sell off for more FG... not really hunting for Guild Points aye?

It is perspective, and there are two cores to consider, or did that fact allude you. Oh wait, it is called Perspective, perception, oh, it is also considered "THEIR" interpretation to what goals they set and what core they want to do this in, and then they have to "Consider" the best action to take the "Steps" to "Fulfill" their "GOAL".

Right? To set a Goal, you have to take the steps necessary to obtain that Goal right? RIGHT???

The only thing worse than elitist gate keepers, is erroneous elitist gate keepers. I have two guild points on the character you looked at. Not sure how "guild points" empower you to have more authority on the subject anyway.

This post was edited by Cascadian on Jan 11 2023 05:13pm

he wasn’t trolling

you are right he was being serious that rex can learn from you

Oh, my apologies. I'm used to the harsh environment of PaRD and general chat.

No one knows what I was meaning and I’m going to keep it that way.

Hence a troll statement without reading previous comments.



Again, you still did not respond to my lesson because you are also trolling... basically, you can not answer my last statement about achieving goals which you stated in your first comment... Goal... #1 / 2 and 4 are the same... prove me wrong or just ignore as you have done so far after my last comment:

fairly confident you could learn from my 7 year old, not trolling I just have no reason to read the spew that comes from you. If I wanted to lose IQ i'd go drink bleach.

I'm not trolling. Just because someone has a different viewpoint than yourself does not mean they are trolling.


You are being an incorrect pedant about some menial thing. I already clearly articulated use cases that don't align to your playstyle, thus satisfyingly this condition.


The burden of proof is on the positive claimant. I have no need to prove you "wrong" (Proving a negative)


I've replied to every single one of your replies but I'll be stopping that immediately as this isn't a productive use of anyone's time.

And you just did what you stated you wouldn't and replied.

"Things that make you go ... Hmm..."



Thus you clearly fail to fulfill a Goal (as you first posted: Goals) ... again, as unproductive as your reply, you still dismiss the STEPS to achieve those goals you first pointed out by listing them in order. Not to mention that you could have stated what transpires from reaching a goal.

Thus, #1, #2 and #4 coincide with each other, henceforth, they don't need to be separated.