Quote (izParagonzi @ 22 Dec 2018 01:06)
Actually, you assume they did, I posted what one person posted and replied to my reasons of why I voted NO. I believe a lot of those votes (yes) were from people that did not think of the implications of what other areas of the game it would have a major impact on. Am I wrong? Are you saying you speak for all of them? Sorry, I am not a mind reader, nor are you, so my post is relevant, seems yours is assumption. Even if I am wrong on some or all of those that voted yes, they should actually post reasons to WHY.
Back @ Gearic... you see, people want a reason to the NO vote, I gave mine, you don't like it, then speak for yourself instead of thinking you know what everyone thinks. Even using "maybe" does not diminish the content of the discussion.
I haven't suggested any more strongly than you have that I can read minds, or speak for anyone other than myself. The only difference between our assertions, is that mine isn't based on an assumption that disagreeing with me suggests a level of incompetence. Oh, and mine also didn't sound like a rant from Happy Noodle Boy.
Oh, wait some more!
Quote (izParagonzi @ 21 Dec 2018 21:48)
... in no way have any of the yes voters thought about other factors... all yes votes are null and void and totally selfish.
Oh, look, turns out that you DID say, without caveat, what it is that other people think. So, you're just a hypocrite.
I get that people want reasons for no votes. That's totally fine. I'm happy to see the viewpoints of those with differing opinions, especially when those viewpoints are convincing and encourage real thought on the matter. So, when you want to take the time to actually articulate your point in a thoughtful manner, with specific points to discuss, then maybe you can contribute something useful (something more than #popcorn, that is).