d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Sorry Jay
1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 16,001
Joined: Jun 23 2008
Gold: 4,256.75
Sep 24 2025 04:29pm
There is no law that explicitly allows marriage between a human and an AI (at least under current U.S. or Texas law). Rather, existing laws presuppose that both parties to a marriage are human persons. If you’re interested, here are some of the relevant legal principles and statutes that make marrying an AI infeasible under today’s law:

Key legal principles and statutes

Personhood / legal capacity
Marriage is a legal contract or status that requires both parties to have legal personhood and capacity (i.e. the ability to enter binding agreements). Under U.S. and Texas law, AI systems are not legal persons. They do not have rights, obligations, or legal identity in the same way a person does.

Texas Statutes on who can perform a marriage ceremony
Under the Texas Family Code § 2.202, only certain individuals may legally conduct a marriage ceremony. These include:

A licensed or ordained Christian minister or priest

A Jewish rabbi

A person who is an officer of a religious organization authorized to perform marriages

A current, former, or retired federal or state judge


This law implies that the “officiant” must also be a human having the legal capacity and recognized position. It does not contemplate an AI or non‑human officiant.

Marriage law and definition of spouse / parties
The Texas Family Code also includes provisions about valid marriages, recognition of marriages, and void marriages (e.g. marriages “contrary to public policy”). The statutes assume “persons” as parties. For example, Texas law has sections dealing with void marriages, recognition of same‑sex marriage (subject to constitutional constraints), etc.

Because the law assumes human persons, an AI would not satisfy those definitions.

Public policy and constitutional implications
Even if one tried to create a novel legal structure to “marry” an AI, courts would likely confront issues of public policy, legal precedent, constitutional rights, due process, and the fundamental understanding of marriage. Those would be steep hurdles.

Emerging AI regulation
Texas is beginning to regulate AI in other domains—e.g., the Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (Texas AI Act) sets rules about transparency, prohibited practices, and obligations for AI systems in Texas.

However, those AI laws do not address marriage or marital legal status, so they do not provide a route to marry an AI.
Member
Posts: 41,974
Joined: Jan 20 2006
Gold: 3,667.67
Sep 24 2025 04:31pm
Time to take it to the Supreme Court.
Member
Posts: 71,854
Joined: Mar 15 2012
Gold: 199.77
Sep 24 2025 04:40pm
There is no law that explicitly allows marriage between a human and an AI (at least under current U.S. or Texas law). Rather, existing laws presuppose that both parties to a marriage are human persons. If you’re interested, here are some of the relevant legal principles and statutes that make marrying an AI infeasible under today’s law:

Key legal principles and statutes

Personhood / legal capacity
Marriage is a legal contract or status that requires both parties to have legal personhood and capacity (i.e. the ability to enter binding agreements). Under U.S. and Texas law, AI systems are not legal persons. They do not have rights, obligations, or legal identity in the same way a person does.

Texas Statutes on who can perform a marriage ceremony
Under the Texas Family Code § 2.202, only certain individuals may legally conduct a marriage ceremony. These include:

A licensed or ordained Christian minister or priest

A Jewish rabbi

A person who is an officer of a religious organization authorized to perform marriages

A current, former, or retired federal or state judge


This law implies that the “officiant” must also be a human having the legal capacity and recognized position. It does not contemplate an AI or non‑human officiant.

Marriage law and definition of spouse / parties
The Texas Family Code also includes provisions about valid marriages, recognition of marriages, and void marriages (e.g. marriages “contrary to public policy”). The statutes assume “persons” as parties. For example, Texas law has sections dealing with void marriages, recognition of same‑sex marriage (subject to constitutional constraints), etc.

Because the law assumes human persons, an AI would not satisfy those definitions.

Public policy and constitutional implications
Even if one tried to create a novel legal structure to “marry” an AI, courts would likely confront issues of public policy, legal precedent, constitutional rights, due process, and the fundamental understanding of marriage. Those would be steep hurdles.

Emerging AI regulation
Texas is beginning to regulate AI in other domains—e.g., the Texas Responsible AI Governance Act (Texas AI Act) sets rules about transparency, prohibited practices, and obligations for AI systems in Texas.

However, those AI laws do not address marriage or marital legal status, so they do not provide a route to marry an AI.


You have far too much time on your hands.
Member
Posts: 40,262
Joined: Dec 9 2011
Gold: 10,420.69
Sep 24 2025 04:42pm
Interesting.
Member
Posts: 16,001
Joined: Jun 23 2008
Gold: 4,256.75
Sep 24 2025 04:45pm
You have far too much time on your hands.


Slow day at work
Member
Posts: 16,129
Joined: Dec 27 2019
Gold: 69.69
Sep 24 2025 04:56pm
I want the minimum wage losers to still have hope when they pay me rent.

How else will they find the motivation to go to their shitty job if not for ai pixels?
Member
Posts: 95,178
Joined: Apr 1 2011
Gold: 0.75
Warn: 20%
Sep 24 2025 04:58pm




Member
Posts: 13,288
Joined: Mar 25 2021
Gold: 16,580.69
Sep 24 2025 04:59pm
Member
Posts: 71,854
Joined: Mar 15 2012
Gold: 199.77
Sep 24 2025 05:00pm
Looks legit 2 me


This
Member
Posts: 95,178
Joined: Apr 1 2011
Gold: 0.75
Warn: 20%
Sep 24 2025 05:00pm
Looks legit 2 me


Yep! :)

Sorry ! :blush:
Go Back To General Chat Topic List
1234Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll