d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > : How To Earth - A Card_sultan Special > Part 2
Prev19394959697350Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Aug 15 2017 02:14pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Aug 15 2017 10:05am)
Nice projection.

Still dodging


still parroting your spinless ad-hominem meaningless rhetoric

nice useless beta tactic

:thumbsup:

Prove the Earth is a spinning sphere hurtling through space at 500,000 or gtfo

Inb4 the inevitable deluded Dodging while accusing me of dodging and is just inverted proof of your psychological projection

This post was edited by card_sultan on Aug 15 2017 02:35pm
Member
Posts: 16,932
Joined: Mar 15 2012
Gold: 0.00
Aug 15 2017 02:47pm


New NASA image, obviously edited and flat earth is now confirmed.


Quote (card_sultan @ Aug 15 2017 04:14pm)
still parroting your spinless ad-hominem meaningless rhetoric

nice useless beta tactic

:thumbsup:

Prove the Earth is a spinning sphere hurtling through space at 500,000 or gtfo

Inb4 the inevitable deluded Dodging while accusing me of dodging and is just inverted proof of your psychological projection


You are a joke.

This post was edited by DeanofDazzle on Aug 15 2017 02:47pm
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Aug 15 2017 02:57pm
Quote (DeanofDazzle @ Aug 15 2017 10:47am)
http://i.imgur.com/Ilvvmt8.gif

New NASA image, obviously edited and flat earth is now confirmed.




You are a joke.


Spinning Ball Earth is the joke, its hilarious that people ever believed we were spinning at 1000 mph.

:rofl:
Member
Posts: 15,032
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 3.37
Aug 15 2017 03:05pm
:rofl:
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Aug 15 2017 03:43pm
Quote (Ep0ch @ Aug 15 2017 11:05am)
:rofl:


thanks for keeping the Fact no one can prove the Spinning Ball Earth such a popular topic

and need to resort to trolling and ad-hominem beta logic

makes sense though - Even Carl Sagan told you Eratosthenes was called Beta for a reason.
Member
Posts: 64,732
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 260.11
Aug 15 2017 03:57pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Aug 15 2017 02:14pm)
still parroting your spinless ad-hominem meaningless rhetoric

nice useless beta tactic

:thumbsup:

Prove the Earth is a spinning sphere hurtling through space at 500,000 or gtfo

Inb4 the inevitable deluded Dodging while accusing me of dodging and is just inverted proof of your psychological projection


Still dodging.

Your fear is palpable
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Aug 15 2017 04:01pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Aug 15 2017 11:57am)
Still dodging.

Your fear is palpable


still using pathetic beta logic, trolls gonna troll

:rofl:

why you scared to post your evidence, oh thats right you have none.

#FEpower

This post was edited by card_sultan on Aug 15 2017 04:11pm
Member
Posts: 52,044
Joined: Jan 3 2009
Gold: 8,933.00
Aug 15 2017 04:22pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Aug 15 2017 01:02pm)
Nah your completely wrong, even Vsause admitted that your assumptions that Eratosthenes was correct is based on your faith. That a close and small sun on a Flat Earth would account for the observations, and its totally why you need to use circular logic and think it provides "de facto" proof. Your failure to use rational logic is a result of the fact you were programmed in that kind of thinking and is based on 2 thousand years of idiots sticking their finger in there ears and screaming laalaalalaala. This is exactly what all you trollers have done, assume based on faith, nary an ounce of actual thought, repeating your dogmatic "de-facto" proofs of men your told to believe. Pathetic betas.


No, what vsauce said was that the math for the angles and lengths of shadows that Eratosthenes used to find the diameter of the ball Earth could be relatively comparable to a near-placed sun over a flat Earth. What he did not do was state that the sun is near or that there is ANY reason to think so. Since it is physically impossible for a ball shaped sun to shine like a spotlight over just a portion of the Earth, and your supremely bullshit excuse called "optical perspective" cannot possibly explain readily observable phenomena, we know the sun can't be close over a flat Earth. We know that Eratosthenes is therefore correct. Good job card, someone with nothing better than time on his hands and a degree of ingenuity from 2000+ years ago is smarter than you, even with a computer and Google. I don't NEED to use circular logic, I've already destroyed all of your shit arguments. I've simply chosen to skip steps now. This is resolved. No, you don't have to agree. You have an opinion, and your opinion is wrong. It's demonstrably wrong, and it's been covered ad nauseam. That's another Latin term for you, sorry. So was per se and de facto. I'm sorry that terms that have carried into the modern lexicon are beyond you. You're still wrong.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Aug 15 2017 04:57pm
Quote (Santara @ Aug 15 2017 12:22pm)
what vsauce said was that the math for the angles and lengths of shadows that Eratosthenes used to find the diameter of the ball Earth could be relatively comparable to a near-placed sun over a flat Earth.


exactly what i said

Quote (Santara @ Aug 15 2017 12:22pm)
What he did not do was state that the sun is near or that there is ANY reason to think so.


of course he never said that , and because he never stated that doesnt mean that your misunderstand in true. Your wrong opinion is based on the absence of evidence, very weak.

Quote (Santara @ Aug 15 2017 12:22pm)
Since it is physically impossible for a ball shaped sun to shine like a spotlight over just a portion of the Earth, and your supremely bullshit excuse called "optical perspective" cannot possibly explain readily observable phenomena, we know the sun can't be close over a flat Earth.


Argument from ignorance which you continue to repeat like a broken record, just because you dont understand it, does not mean its false.

Quote (Santara @ Aug 15 2017 12:22pm)
We know that Eratosthenes is therefore correct.


Incorrect conclusion, there actually is no evidence the sun is far away and huge, this is just your wrong opinion and pure faith in Betalogic. Even Newton only said the Sun was 1 million miles away - so was he also 93% wrong with everything else?



Quote (Santara @ Aug 15 2017 12:22pm)
Good job card, someone with nothing better than time on his hands and a degree of ingenuity from 2000+ years ago is smarter than you, even with a computer and Google.


Very weak ad-hominem, i expect better trolls from you

Quote (Santara @ Aug 15 2017 12:22pm)
I don't NEED to use circular logic, I've already destroyed all of your shit arguments.


Stating your opinion as fact is incredulous rubbish meant to ease your cognitive dissonance.


Quote (Santara @ Aug 15 2017 12:22pm)
I've simply chosen to skip steps now. This is resolved. No, you don't have to agree. You have an opinion, and your opinion is wrong.
It's demonstrably wrong, and it's been covered ad nauseam. That's another Latin term for you, sorry. So was per se and de facto. I'm sorry that terms that have carried into the modern lexicon are beyond you. You're still wrong.


Just because you simple repeat something 20x, doesn't make you right, I think we all understand you believe in everything the state wants you to believe, where as I make up my own mind.
Im sorry that it bothers you to the nth degree. Get over it.

It also not my job to convince you of the shape of the earth, especially to someone who refuses to look at evidence like you do all the time.
You're like a stubborn ornery mule who refuses to drink water in the desert, thats cool. Keep them blinders on, there were made for a reason.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Aug 15 2017 05:11pm
Member
Posts: 24,699
Joined: Jan 16 2016
Gold: 53.69
Warn: 10%
Aug 15 2017 05:10pm
Considering we are living in the first of 7 (was it 7 not sure) circles. People living in "other circles" of the planet. What are they told? The earth is a circle with a hole in it? Im kind of curious

Admit that our universe theory as we know it still makes a lot of sense. Flawless.

Keep in mind that i believe in quute a few conspiracy theory
Go Back To General Chat Topic List
Prev19394959697350Next
Closed New Topic New Poll