So if the Earth and the air are moving at 1000 mph in the same direction, why does an Airplane flying in the opposite direction not need to resist those forces?

I already know your response so i'll speed this up a little: "Because the air is relative, like in a car retard, dont you understand physics idiot!"

Well the Air inside a car is relative because it's a closed environment. Is the Earth a closed Environment?

your response: "No retard because we went to the moon, idiot"

So let's take your awesome car and turn it into a convertible - how relative is the air in that space the roof once was?

your response - "shut up idiot - stop making me think, my physics teacher never told me that, you must be trolling me!"

end scene




[ ] We went to the Moon because we are in an open environment

[ ] The Air is relative on Earth because we are in a closed environment

pick one genius

This post was edited by card_sultan on Aug 14 2017 05:00pm

We know well the 500 year old philosophy you live by. You should correct the quote is your sig

"Teach a man a lie and they will think they know how to reason."

The airplane is also moving 1000 mph in the same direction. So is a person standing still on the ground. There is zero reason to think any effort is necessary for going along for the ride. A plane flying in the opposite direction of the 1000 mph spin doesn't have to resist 1000 mph of headwind. If it was flying at an indicated airspeed of 500 mph, it would be flying forward, but "moving backward." Because momentum and gravity. You've been told this, but you just don't get it. You're simply not smart enough to understand.

We are not in a closed environment per se, we are in a de facto closed environment. The correct answer to your pick one is both. Because it's true.

Classic - shift the goalpost with Circle jerk logic, so basically "dodge the de-facto's"

you are a well trained seal in the ways of psy-ence.

Sorry for making your head hurt but this really doesn't get any easier. His claiming we are in a "de-facto" closed environment is just a false equivalency in that hes saying - "This is the way it is, therefore why i think it is that way must be correct.

Maybe this analogy would be easier to understand. Rick from Rick & Morty uses "de-facto" psy-ence.

You don't get to call your ignorance of physics a shifting of the goalposts. You are patently ignorant of how the world works and all I have done is try to dispel your ignorance. Horses. Troughs. No drinking. You get the bit.