Not Eddie!

and thats a wrap.

He was really annoying to fight

Man has strong feelings about his 'zza

Looks like youre right

I want to talk about what I call, political bet-hedging. So basically, in an election, extremely wealthy donors (very often Jews) donate money to candidates who have completely opposing platforms. This is so that no matter who wins, the winner will be beholden to the donors and will do whatever they want, such as pass laws that they ask for.

When I think about something like this, it makes me angry. When I donate my hard-earned money to a candidate, it's because I believe in what he says. I share his vision. My support for him is real and it comes from my heart. And I would never in a million years donate to his opponent. I want the candidate who shares my values to win. But these political bet-hedgers game our system, just because they have a few more dirty shekels than the rest of us. These people, they don't have any political convictions like you or I do. They have no principles, no morals, no ideals, they don't believe in anything. They only care about furthering their influence and making their bank accounts even fatter. In fact, they are exactly the type of people who would persuade countries to go to war with one another, just so that they could profit off the conflict and the deaths and suffering that come with it. They believe in neither side's cause, all they want to do is sell arms to both sides, and make tons of money. I mean just look at who supplied and outfitted armies and bankrolled wars throughout the history of Europe. Hint: it was not Christians. The sad thing though is that people like this are very reproductively successful. They tend to have a lot of children, whom they fathered with many women, because their obscene amounts of money allow them to hoard women like that. The dead Jew Epstein comes to mind. He kept twenty women around, who were all pregnant by him. He probably thought his ability to control, coerce, manipulate and blackmail powerful politicians meant his genes were very superior. The fact he was wealthy further cemented this view. He probably genuinely thought he should pass on lots of copies of his genes. A lot of Jews think like this.

Anyway, back to political bet-hedging. I think it would be very difficult to prove an instance of political bet-hedging. People can donate to whoever they want, for whatever reason they want. Even though we all know they donate purely for entirely selfish, self-serving reasons; it is not because they genuinely believe in a cause or want to support a particular candidate. I really feel the phenomenon of political bet-hedging is a real, serious problem, however it is one that is not provable, and there is nothing we can do about it.

There is something else that is related to political bet-hedging: Trump. It doesn't involve money, it involves something else. The Jew-run media display Trump's Jew son-in-law prominently, because they want the whiteys who worship Trump to think that Jews are A-OK. Jews are ok to have as in-laws and relatives. It's totally ok to let black-haired Jews marry, get on top of, fuck, and impregnate your blond daughters. Rich Jews still mostly fund lefty causes and the Democrats, but they put Trump out there, so as to give themselves an escape hatch. They do this with every mainstream right-wing celebrities. Alex Jones is one such individual. He was married to a Jewess and his kids are Jewish. Jews want white people to believe in lefty causes, but that sometimes doesn't work, so they try hard to make sure the ones who are right-leaning, will also think Jews are totally fine, too. Jews are essentially very intelligent animals who specialize in surviving, at all cost. That's all they care about, they don't care about anything or anybody else. If anybody gets in their way, they will do whatever necessary to eliminate this person. It doesn't matter if it means causing him extreme amounts of suffering, or even straight up murdering him. These things mean absolutely nothing to Jews. As long as they get to live, anything is justified and nothing is off-limits. By the way, have you noticed how Jews in the Hollywood really love putting out pieces where white people are seen as rescuing Jews' lives? Schindler's List comes to mind. They like to really hold up these Jew-saving white people like some kind of role model, to show other white people how they should also behave. They do this as an escape catch, as I said previously. They know how evil the things they do truly are, and that if one day white people ever catch on, they will be in extremely big trouble. So they put this theme in all the shows and movies they prolifically churn out. In this way, they are like a mind virus. They infect white people's minds, and then change their behaviors.

Nvm

Day of Reckoning: I hope that one day, the day will come when feds have to face charges for the things they have done. And then appropriate punishment will be meted out to them, according the severity of what they have done. Some of what they have done might even be legal. But they can't use this as an excuse. The law shouldn't be the only thing that stops you from doing bad things. They can't be like, "But it wasn't illegal at the time when we committed it." For someone who is smart enough to work for the CIA or the FBI, you should have been able to figure out for yourself out that what your boss asked you to do wasn't right.

Why does the CIA try to recruit in places like the LGBTQ community:

Two things you need to know about the CIA: 1. It has long been under the influence of Jews and has been of Jewish nature for a very long time, and 2. As such, this agency actively hates white males, because the heavy Jewish influence at the top hates white males. Now, the CIA needs to hire people from time to time. It actively looks into the LGBTQ community because all of them in there are not straight white males. The CIA does not want to hire straight white males because it would mean they would have income with which they could raise families and have white babies. A job with the CIA is also quite prestigious and they hate the idea of white males having prestigious jobs. They really do. The Jew bosses' hate for white males is so overwhelming that it actually causes them to act in an irrational manner-- they overlook the smartest segment of the population (aka, white dudes) and look in improbable places for talents. Although I must say that it can be a good idea to look for talent within the tranny population. Male-to-female trannies, no matter how many body parts they chop off, still possess a male brain (a fact that chagrins them endlessly). So, even though on the outside they might look somewhat like a woman, on the inside, they still possess the brain of a white dude, which means they could potentially be smart. Now, the Jews in the CIA get something that is the functional equivalent of a white guy, but in a package that is, I suppose, a bit easier to control and manipulate. Trannies are very well-known for their lack of self esteem. If you call her by her chosen, female name, she will be putty in your hands.

I was reading up on the CIA, I mainly wanted to find out whether they shifted responsibility and answered questions evasively regarding their involvement in a host of unethical activities, one being torture, which they euphemistically refer to as, "enhanced interrogation techniques".

The stuff I accidentally turned up was about Gina Haspel, she was the director of CIA for a few years.

Link: https://www.justsecurity.org/56574/enhanced-evasion-techniques/

You can also find out more about her on wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gina_Haspel

I found evidence of evasive behaviors in the first link. Honestly I have to say I was really repulsed. The CIA is supposed to be one of the nation's top intelligence agencies, the moral character of their operatives and certainly the director, should be beyond reproach. Yet look at the kinds of things she gave as "answers". I really hope for the sake of Americans that the article in the first link was just a hit piece and it was all made up. Otherwise the truth is almost too harsh to bear.

I want to talk about Sam Brinton, the man who served in high office in US government. He is male, but he wears dresses and lipstick. He doesn't even respect himself; how can we expect him to respect his job? Reality proves that Briton is trash. This she-man has been caught stealing on three occasions. It seems that
the LGBTQ community has a lot of trash like him.

Some of the stuff I read about the CIA is quite subject to speculation. And I can already foresee some people leaping to the CIA's defense. To that I say, if the CIA acts like they are a nest of spies, and they keep everything they do hush-hush, naturally there will be talks among the people. But some people act like the CIA is such a victim. Can you believe people?

Hello. I think racial differences in behavior is a very interesting topic, however, it's never talked about publicly, which is another thing that is intriguing. You know what I am talking about, this overwhelming pressure in the air that says we must never notice racial differences, and if we do, we are evil racists who should burn in hell.

Anyway, I just think it's totally possible that there are behavioral differences among the races. My reasoning: Different races evolved in different environments, and as such, they faced different evolutionary pressures. As a result, they developed different traits in a lot of areas. This is so common sense that I think the real questions should be, "Who are these people that insist races are different in looks only and why do they believe this crap?"

I mean the races are very different in terms of looks. Is it really that much of a stretch to believe that they might differ in other ways, too? I say that it is absolutely possible that they differ in other ways, for example, behavioral, cognitive, mental, and psychological...etc. We are just too scared to talk about it out in the open, is all. And this is purely political. It has nothing to do with science.

An anecdote: I am Asian, and I constantly talk to my girlfriends about the different ways white people act when compared to our people. More specifically we like to talk about the ways white guys tend to act when they are interested in you. We talk about this stuff because even though none of us is a sociologist or a biologist, we still easily notice that white guys act differently than Asian guys when they like you. And this is just one among the many ways the two races are different. I am sure in your social circle, you have also heard similar talks, too. You are just too scared to discuss it in public, and this is especially true if you are white.

By the way, would you like to know who started all this unbearable pressure? It's Jews. Jews like to claim that humans are completely the same on the inside, because it is difficult to prove otherwise. It is much harder to claim the other way around because everyone can see they don't, and they will realize that Jews are full of shit. Again.

Have you noticed that people who are beautiful, tend to be good, such as white people, and people who are ugly, tend to be evil, such as Jews? We like to think that Nature is fair, she fashioned the different races with unique attributes that are specifically reserved for each, something good for each race. No, that's human wishful thinking and reality is nothing like that at all. Nature is not concerned with being fair, nor giving each race something that will make them feel good about themselves. Instead, there is a bit of a "Winner take all" thing going on. When you are a race with good traits, these traits are the best, and they come in copious amounts. When you are a race that has nothing going for it, you will suck at literally everything, and you will be at the very bottom of the pole. In other words, a beautiful race will not only be beautiful, they will also be good people, and not only that, they are also intelligent. They will also be competent, ethical, considerate, empathetic, and a whole bunch of other really nice things that I won't list, because it would be too long. Nature is not fair.

I want to talk about how bribery works in the West. I believe that would-be bribers don't actually approach a politician and say to him, "I would like to bribe you", or "I want to get you to do despicable things for money". Something like those might fly in a more corrupt country like China or India, but not in the West. Instead, these bribers probably first try to get close to the politician they want to bribe by getting into his life. Maybe invite him out for coffee or lunch a few times. This can be achieved by the bribers claiming to be his constituents and that they would like some of his time. In other cases, maybe the would-be bribers worked with him on his campaign with the aim of getting close to him and connecting with him. My point is that since he is a public official, getting close to him isn't very difficult. Then, the bribers will start showering him with nice things and favors. For example, they will treat him to dinners at nice, expensive restaurants, and give him nice things, things that make his life very pleasant, such as a jacuzzi suit or a Rolex watch or a speed boat, things like that. And they will make it sound totally innocent, they will say that it's a gift to him to show their appreciation for his hard work, or something like that. Then, once he is accustomed to the sweet life, the bribers then come out and indicate to him what they want done, usually what laws they want him to pass. If he has integrity and refuses, then the gifts and nice things stop coming. But he has become accustomed to having them. So now, his brain chemistry will scream at him to do whatever it takes to keep the dopamine hits coming, and that means more gifts and perks and favors. So he does what the bribers want him to do. This is the process by which a normally non-corrupt politician can be bribed and corrupted.

Other times, the bribers start with the politician's family, usually his wife. They will shower her with gifts and nice things. They will do this till she gets "hooked", and then she will implore him to do the bribers' bidding because her brain is addicted to the nice things and she will do whatever it takes to keep the gifts and nice things coming. This is a powerful tactic because even though a principled politician is normally hard to bribe, when the closest person in his life starts putting pressure on him, it's hard to say no to that. So the bribers effortlessly recruited the most important person in a politician's life to persuade him to do what they want.

Some people think that their occupation makes them an "essential worker". One such occupation is a health care provider, such as family doctor. Family doctors probably think, "People get sick all the time and I treat them and sometimes refer them to a specialist. My job is essential and cannot be replaced." But guess what? You are wrong. You are looking at this from the perspective of a regular person. To the ruling elites, your work is not essential, because the people you treat, which are the masses, are not essential to them. To them, the real essential, non-replaceable workers are the ones directly tending them and their families. If you and other family doctors stopped working tomorrow and people died as a result, guess what? This doesn't hurt the elites one bit. They would not care at all. You are replaceable because the people you treat are replaceable.

I have seen quite a few investment guides and strategies, written by people who hope to be able to retire as early as possible. Apparently this is what a lot of people dream about. What they don't know is that, the government wants the total opposite of that. The government likes having a lot of workers who pay taxes. It also wants to ensure there is a big pool of labor to work for the corporations that it's in bed with and whose interests it cares about and tries to protect, as opposed to ours. As such, people who openly talk about an investment strategy that is actually successful work against themselves, because if too many people copy the strategy and start becoming financially independent, this will draw the government's attention. The government will then pass new laws to make the investment strategy stop working. The government does not want a lot of people retiring early and not working to make taxes for it and profit for its corporate cronies.