d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Globe Earth
Prev18648658668678681933Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 20,253
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 5,267.97
May 16 2018 07:38am
Quote (Melatonina @ May 16 2018 02:57pm)
I can easily prove it without talking about micro waves

everyone on the earth see the sun with the same size in the sky. that is a fact. from where ever you go on the planet it will have the same size in the sky.
this is only possible if the distance between earth and sun is big ebough, which is the case here.

If the sun was a fireball dancing over a flat earth, it would appear bigger for people right under it, and smaller to people living far away from it.
Secondly, its size would vary as the sun is travelling to the others parts of that flat disk, which obviously has never been observed before

Here I made you a little draw : Sun looks bigger in the sky for B , but much smaller for A and C

https://i.imgur.com/UFM5VeJ.png

even a handicapped child could understand that, but I doubt you can tough.

Now apologize and stop posting dumb theories that have only been validated by uneducated youtubers , thanks


Cue a photoshopped picture of the sun looking super big above the horizon.
Member
Posts: 11,784
Joined: Dec 4 2015
Gold: 1,501.53
May 16 2018 07:39am
Photoshop is flat
Sun is flat
Horizon is flat
Checkmate jsp
Member
Posts: 23,832
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
May 16 2018 07:46am
Quote (Melatonina @ May 16 2018 02:57pm)
I can easily prove it without talking about micro waves

everyone on the earth see the sun with the same size in the sky. that is a fact. from where ever you go on the planet it will have the same size in the sky.
this is only possible if the distance between earth and sun is big ebough, which is the case here.

If the sun was a fireball dancing over a flat earth, it would appear bigger for people right under it, and smaller to people living far away from it.
Secondly, its size would vary as the sun is travelling to the others parts of that flat disk, which obviously has never been observed before

Here I made you a little draw : Sun looks bigger in the sky for B , but much smaller for A and C

https://i.imgur.com/UFM5VeJ.png

even a handicapped child could understand that, but I doubt you can tough.

Now apologize and stop posting dumb theories that have only been validated by uneducated youtubers , thanks


According to Chivas
Its caused by magnification by water in gas form in the atmosphere

According to Card
Its caused by light refraction by the atmosphere

This post was edited by kai_jph on May 16 2018 07:47am
Member
Posts: 86,546
Joined: May 13 2009
Gold: 1,000.69
May 16 2018 09:26am
Quote (kai_jph @ May 16 2018 08:46am)
According to Chivas
Its caused by magnification by water in gas form in the atmosphere

According to Card
Its caused by light refraction by the atmosphere



This shouldnt suprise anybody :rofl:
Member
Posts: 17,567
Joined: Mar 5 2016
Gold: 27.45
Warn: 40%
May 16 2018 09:39am
Quote (kai_jph @ May 16 2018 02:46pm)
According to Chivas
Its caused by magnification by water in gas form in the atmosphere

According to Card
Its caused by light refraction by the atmosphere


According to them, we dont understand physic or anything correctly, only flat earthers does, even though we made crazy things including computers they're using lmao

I am asking : did flat earthers ever made something beside youtube videos ? do they have any proof like photos for this flat earth and hidden lands ? no

I still think they must be trolling
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
May 16 2018 11:34am
Quote (Santara @ May 16 2018 01:50am)
Except for the fact that EM waves are observed to travel billions of light years to us here on Earth. Every night. It can be measured by noting the redshift. You're the one claiming it's not possible, so prove it.

Even before we started using radar to get precise measurements of the distance to Venus, scientists centuries ago were able to use parallax measurements of the transit of Venus across the sun to get results close to the modern results (within 2 to 4 percent).

Breasts pulled down by gravity.

Buoyancy is a FORCE.

You went full recard.

It isn't faith, it is proven. There are tests you can conduct to prove it. There are even accelerometers that measure variances in local gravity.

You don't have any engineer friends that believe in a flat Earth, so you would be lying. I notice you dodged the fuck out of drainage plumbing.


You didn't debunk a SINGLE point of mine, much less all of them. You aren't good enough to debunk me.


You're the one claiming redshift proves light travels for 1000s of light years, you need to prove your assertion, what is a repeatable testable experiment we can do here on earth, you have one right - it was not just something the penguins made up to go along with there fantasy story?

Parallax calculations are based on a curved earth , which assumes that because the shadow during a lunar eclipse is round it must be that of the earth and selenelion eclipses (where the sun and moon are both above the horizon proves the the earth is not the cause for the shadow) If you dont assume the earth is an oblate spheroid of a pear shape with an equatorial bulge of 14 miles high, the calculations are nowhere near your inflated numbers.

Breast are pulled down from unused muscular tissue, if gravity was the cause, 18 year old girls would have saggy boobs. This is just another excuse pawned off on stupid people who believe in the grabbity myth relegion, really i think they are mocking how gullible you are.

You just went full Santard.

Variations in the rate which things fall can be due to atmospheric pressure and humidity.

I do know engineers that believe in Flat Earth, they just dont publicize it because they know people like you that believe in the Ball Earth Religion are so offended and that's not good for the business they are in. Scientics are fired if they dont publicly support the big bang paradox, the evolution fallacy or the infinite universe fantasy model.

I didn't dodge your drainage excuse, most people think that dropping something is due to grabbity, and because an item falls because it is heavier than the air and cant support it does not mean it was sucked toward the supposed earths core by an invisible unproven unproducible magic archaic religious force.

Debunked again - you lose, FE for the win always.


Quote (Melatonina @ May 16 2018 02:57am)
I can easily prove it without talking about micro waves

everyone on the earth see the sun with the same size in the sky. that is a fact. from where ever you go on the planet it will have the same size in the sky.
this is only possible if the distance between earth and sun is big ebough, which is the case here.

If the sun was a fireball dancing over a flat earth, it would appear bigger for people right under it, and smaller to people living far away from it.
Secondly, its size would vary as the sun is travelling to the others parts of that flat disk, which obviously has never been observed before

Here I made you a little draw : Sun looks bigger in the sky for B , but much smaller for A and C

https://i.imgur.com/UFM5VeJ.png

even a handicapped child could understand that, but I doubt you can tough.

Now apologize and stop posting dumb theories that have only been validated by uneducated youtubers , thanks


Onfg - did you draw that yourself, wow that's by far the worst ive ever seen so congrats on failing Kindergarten.

First off everyone doesn't see the sun at the same time - only half the people see the sun at one time.

Secondly objects in the sky dont change size like objects on the ground and is known as vertical perspective or astral perspective.

Why doesn't an airplane change size as it crosses the sky?

Thirdly as the Sun crosses the sky - its angular resolution is affected by increasing layers of moisture in the air and any slight change in size is nullified by humidity magnification.

Now apologize and stop posting parroted ridiculous misrepresentations from the internet that every ball believer claims when they first come across flat earth by pretending your a genius for coping debunked ideas that every jsper has already tried and failed with while succeeding at pointing out how completely fake and foolish they are are.

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 16 2018 11:50am
Member
Posts: 4,063
Joined: May 24 2008
Gold: 719.75
May 16 2018 11:42am
Quote (card_sultan @ May 16 2018 01:34pm)
Your the one claiming redshift proves light travels for 1000s of light years, you need to prove your assertion, what is a repeatable testable experiment we can do here on earth, you have one right - it was not just something the penguins made up to go along with there fantasy story?

Parallax calculations are based on a curved earth , which assumes that because the shadow during a lunar eclipse is round it must be that of the earth and selenelion eclipses (where the sun and moon are both above the horizon proves the the earth is not the cause for the shadow) If you dont assume the earth is an oblate spheroid of a pear shape with an equatorial bulge of 14 miles high, the calculations are nowhere near your inflated numbers.

Breast are pulled down from unused muscular tissue, if gravity was the cause, 18 year old girls would have saggy boobs. This is just another excuse pawned off on stupid people who believe in the grabbity myth relegion, really i think they are mocking how gullible you are.

You just went full Santard.

Variations in the rate which things fall can be due to atmospheric pressure and humidity.

I do know engineers that believe in Flat Earth, they just dont publicize it because they know people like you that believe in the Ball Earth Religion are so offended and that's not good for the business they are in. Scientics are fired if they dont piblicly support the big bang theory and the evolution fallacy or the infinite universe fantasy model.

I didn't dodge your drainage excuse, most people think that dropping something is due to grabbity, and because an item falls because it is heavier than the air and cant support it does not mean it was sucked toward the supposed earths core by an invisible unproven unproducible magic archaic religious force.

Debunked again - you lose, FE for the win always.




Onfg - did you draw that yourself, wow that's by far the worst ive ever seen so congrats on failing Kindergarten.

First off everyone doesn't see the sun at the same time - only half the people see the sun at one time.

Secondly objects in the sky dont change size like objects on the ground and is known as vertical perspective or astral perspective.

Why doesn't an airplane change size as it crosses the sky?

Thirdly as the Sun crosses the sky - its angular resolution is affected by increasing layers of moisture in the air and any slight change in size is nullified by humidity magnification.

Now apologize and stop posting parroted ridiculous paradies from the internet that every ball believer claims when they first come across flat earth by pretending your a genius for coping debunked ideas that every jsper has already tried and failed with while succeeding at pointing out how completely fake and foolish you are.


Wrong
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
May 16 2018 11:47am
Quote (Chainsaw47 @ May 16 2018 07:42am)
Wrong


no u
Member
Posts: 92,973
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 16 2018 11:48am
Quote (card_sultan @ May 16 2018 11:34am)
You're the one claiming redshift proves light travels for 1000s of light years, you need to prove your assertion, what is a repeatable testable experiment we can do here on earth, you have one right - it was not just something the penguins made up to go along with there fantasy story?

Parallax calculations are based on a curved earth , which assumes that because the shadow during a lunar eclipse is round it must be that of the earth and selenelion eclipses (where the sun and moon are both above the horizon proves the the earth is not the cause for the shadow) If you dont assume the earth is an oblate spheroid of a pear shape with an equatorial bulge of 14 miles high, the calculations are nowhere near your inflated numbers.

Breast are pulled down from unused muscular tissue, if gravity was the cause, 18 year old girls would have saggy boobs. This is just another excuse pawned off on stupid people who believe in the grabbity myth relegion, really i think they are mocking how gullible you are.

You just went full Santard.

Variations in the rate which things fall can be due to atmospheric pressure and humidity.

I do know engineers that believe in Flat Earth, they just dont publicize it because they know people like you that believe in the Ball Earth Religion are so offended and that's not good for the business they are in. Scientics are fired if they dont publicly support the big bang paradox, the evolution fallacy or the infinite universe fantasy model.

I didn't dodge your drainage excuse, most people think that dropping something is due to grabbity, and because an item falls because it is heavier than the air and cant support it does not mean it was sucked toward the supposed earths core by an invisible unproven unproducible magic archaic religious force.

Debunked again - you lose, FE for the win always.




Onfg - did you draw that yourself, wow that's by far the worst ive ever seen so congrats on failing Kindergarten.

First off everyone doesn't see the sun at the same time - only half the people see the sun at one time.

Secondly objects in the sky dont change size like objects on the ground and is known as vertical perspective or astral perspective.

Why doesn't an airplane change size as it crosses the sky?

Thirdly as the Sun crosses the sky - its angular resolution is affected by increasing layers of moisture in the air and any slight change in size is nullified by humidity magnification.

Now apologize and stop posting parroted ridiculous paradies from the internet that every ball believer claims when they first come across flat earth by pretending your a genius for coping debunked ideas that every jsper has already tried and failed with while succeeding at pointing out how completely fake and foolish you are.


Wewlad
Member
Posts: 15,032
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 3.37
May 16 2018 11:49am
Quote (card_sultan @ May 16 2018 12:34pm)
You're the one claiming redshift proves light travels for 1000s of light years, you need to prove your assertion, what is a repeatable testable experiment we can do here on earth, you have one right - it was not just something the penguins made up to go along with there fantasy story?

Parallax calculations are based on a curved earth , which assumes that because the shadow during a lunar eclipse is round it must be that of the earth and selenelion eclipses (where the sun and moon are both above the horizon proves the the earth is not the cause for the shadow) If you dont assume the earth is an oblate spheroid of a pear shape with an equatorial bulge of 14 miles high, the calculations are nowhere near your inflated numbers.

Breast are pulled down from unused muscular tissue, if gravity was the cause, 18 year old girls would have saggy boobs. This is just another excuse pawned off on stupid people who believe in the grabbity myth relegion, really i think they are mocking how gullible you are.

You just went full Santard.

Variations in the rate which things fall can be due to atmospheric pressure and humidity.

I do know engineers that believe in Flat Earth, they just dont publicize it because they know people like you that believe in the Ball Earth Religion are so offended and that's not good for the business they are in. Scientics are fired if they dont publicly support the big bang paradox, the evolution fallacy or the infinite universe fantasy model.

I didn't dodge your drainage excuse, most people think that dropping something is due to grabbity, and because an item falls because it is heavier than the air and cant support it does not mean it was sucked toward the supposed earths core by an invisible unproven unproducible magic archaic religious force.

Debunked again - you lose, FE for the win always.




Onfg - did you draw that yourself, wow that's by far the worst ive ever seen so congrats on failing Kindergarten.

First off everyone doesn't see the sun at the same time - only half the people see the sun at one time.

Secondly objects in the sky dont change size like objects on the ground and is known as vertical perspective or astral perspective.

Why doesn't an airplane change size as it crosses the sky?

Thirdly as the Sun crosses the sky - its angular resolution is affected by increasing layers of moisture in the air and any slight change in size is nullified by humidity magnification.

Now apologize and stop posting parroted ridiculous paradies from the internet that every ball believer claims when they first come across flat earth by pretending your a genius for coping debunked ideas that every jsper has already tried and failed with while succeeding at pointing out how completely fake and foolish you are.


Go Back To General Chat Topic List
Prev18648658668678681933Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll