Quote (card_sultan @ May 15 2018 01:44am)
Nothing is preventing it from shining in the main circle?
Incorrect - there is the inverse square law and the law of perspective. Your silly understanding is based on light traveling forever in infinite empty space
that is actually 97 dark matter and dark energy and having no idea what it is or does.
Except we talking about a 2nd source of light not too fare away
What reference do you have for all of this
The laws of perpective is mearly how human vision works. It does not obstruct light especially since there's a clear line of sight to this 2nd sun and you also say that the sun is not a undirectional light source
Dark matter is a plausible explanation but no proof exists to it obstructing the 2nd sun light
Quote (card_sultan @ May 15 2018 01:44am)
We have lots of working models of flat earth, let me know once you can make water stick to a ball and youll have one too?
That is a contradiction in itself and shows you have no proof since only 1 model can be correct
Quote (card_sultan @ May 15 2018 01:44am)
Going across Antarica - thats about as likely as building your own rocket and going to space - like it only 100 miles up, why so lazy?
Sound much easier than trying to cross 1000+~'s of miles at -50C in nearly impassable mountainous terrain.
People have travelled to antarctica before and in this model we have a summer gate to pass through
Quote (card_sultan @ May 15 2018 01:44am)
Acually means anything circular in shape
Those definitions are correct but sphere is also correct
In that convo the guy from fes was clearly using round to mean sperical
If not then he meant "there is no flat mars society since mars has been observerd to be flat and disk like in shape"
This post was edited by kai_jph on May 14 2018 10:32pm