Plenty and I've already presented non nasa proof (eg looking at the moon through a telescope). You don't agree so we each each go our own way as far as beliefs are concerned

I'm not trying to prove the edge of the universe nor do I care

As per your belief, neither of us has proof so now how is your theory more credible than mine?

This post was edited by kai_jph on Aug 13 2017 01:26pm

Chivas approaches FE in the Christian sense, my approach is slightly different but there are no atheists on FE. There is no one standard FE'er like you assume.

Is their one standard Ball Earther - are they all the same?

I could show you a picture of the dumbest Liberal/Republican ever - does that mean they are all like that? Please this in just false equivalency that most people fall for.

your doing the same thing with FE.



Yes he is suppose to be holding up the great celestial sphere, but he most often is depicted as holding up the Earth, dont you know social consensus determines things, geez.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Aug 13 2017 01:35pm

Yes

I guess your right, there all fakers

You free to believe that , I'm free to disagree.
But now with all the inconsistencies and no proof with the FE model what makes flat earhers any different

Keep watching this show on your tv, im sure you would win.....







you cant prove the Helios model, so I cant believe in your sacred cartoons

This post was edited by card_sultan on Aug 13 2017 02:37pm

I don't watch broadcast or cable TV.

Like I said, you're certainly entitled to your wrong opinion.

I wasn't talking about watching tv- I was making fun of your blindness.

Yet another example of you totally missing the point.

Aww, you upset that I didn't bite on your weak, unoriginal joke? Poor baby.

You can also pretend I'm blind when I'm obviously not, you're entitled to that wrong opinion also.