d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Globe Earth
Prev18008018028038041933Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 15,032
Joined: Apr 30 2008
Gold: 3.37
May 10 2018 12:55pm
Quote (Ep0ch @ May 10 2018 01:37pm)
Card. For every piece of evidence you offer to prove flat earth, I will offer 2 or more that show the opposite. I will also include experiments that can be replicated when applicable.

Since I know you can't provide any proof of any kind, never mind repeatable experiments, I am quiet certain, I will not have to counter ANYTHING.

GG Wuz EZPK

RIP BEST BUDDY.

:santa:


End of thread.

:locked:
Member
Posts: 4,064
Joined: May 24 2008
Gold: 719.75
May 10 2018 12:57pm
Quote (card_sultan @ May 10 2018 02:55pm)
ha - nice rage post



You must be confusing the post with another, I’m asking some easy questions that you obviously know the answer to, judging by how confident you are :)
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
May 10 2018 12:57pm
Quote (Ep0ch @ May 10 2018 08:55am)
End of thread.

:locked:


so claiming you went to Africa is now 2 pieces of evidence?

lol
Member
Posts: 30,095
Joined: Jul 18 2007
Gold: 7.00
May 10 2018 12:58pm
You should be in prison
Member
Posts: 92,975
Joined: Dec 31 2007
Gold: 2,299.94
May 10 2018 12:58pm
getting card to understand there are different types of magnets/magnetism will be as hard as getting him to accept there are more than one type of spring. even after he himself posted a source of spring types that listed the spring in question, which he then blamed on NASA, to everyone's confusion.

This post was edited by thesnipa on May 10 2018 12:59pm
Member
Posts: 23,832
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
May 10 2018 01:00pm
Quote (card_sultan @ May 10 2018 08:53pm)
No proof earth is a spinning ball rocket - your faith in "learned" scholars is just an excuse to outsource your intelligence to authority

dont be so lazy


Likewise

So you can't prove your theories (by your own admission) and you regect proof I posted.

Thus according to you (indirectly) both our theories have a chance if being wrong
How then is your position better?

The difference between the two of us.
I don't care if you disagree with the GE.
You care about us realising the earth is flat but have nothing to go on
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
May 10 2018 01:00pm
Quote (Chainsaw47 @ May 10 2018 08:57am)
You must be confusing the post with another, I’m asking some easy questions that you obviously know the answer to, judging by how confident you are :)


post the link where i said there is no magnetic field, just that a magnetic field cant be maintained above the curie temperature and your assertion that it can is pseudoscience
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
May 10 2018 01:01pm
Quote (kai_jph @ May 10 2018 09:00am)
Likewise

So you can't prove your theories (by your own admission) and you regect proof I posted.

Thus according to you (indirectly) both our theories have a chance if being wrong
How then is your position better?

The difference between the two of us.
I don't care if you disagree with the GE.
You care about us realising the earth is flat but have nothing to go on


If you cant prove the spinning ball, your consensus is just a religious belief

Kindly Refer to it as your Holiest of Great Balls in Space, ok?

This post was edited by card_sultan on May 10 2018 01:03pm
Member
Posts: 4,064
Joined: May 24 2008
Gold: 719.75
May 10 2018 01:06pm
Quote (card_sultan @ May 10 2018 03:00pm)
post the link where i said there is no magnetic field, just that a magnetic field cant be maintained above the curie temperature and your assertion that it can is pseudoscience



Then prove the Earth’s core is below the Curie point for Iron. It’s one or the other, otherwise your argument makes absolutely no sense.

If you believe the temperature is below the Curie point for Iron (you need to prove this), then explain how the concept of ferromagnetism applies for a flat Earth. If you believe the temperature is above the Curie point for Iron (which it is), but also believe there is a magnetic field (which exists), explain how this magnetic field is created as it cannot be ferromagnetism.

I know you won’t answer, I just like asking questions and seeing how you’ll try to get out of it. Will it be accusations of pseudoscience? Will you shift the burden of proof? Will you throw some insults around? Place your bets.
Member
Posts: 23,832
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
May 10 2018 01:06pm
Quote (card_sultan @ May 10 2018 09:01pm)
If you cant prove the spinning ball, your consensus is just a religious belief


You cant prove the FE or more land beyond the Ice Wall (which chivas even disagrees with)

You a more zealous and even claimed willing to be a martyr for your beliefs
Looks quite a bit like a religion
Go Back To General Chat Topic List
Prev18008018028038041933Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll