Funny hearing you ask for proof.


Thanks for giving me a silly tool to "discredit" every image you will ever post ever again.
I used that jpgsnooper on every image you ever posted, and they are all fake.
Or you could admit its a poor tool for such a task.

I also used it on a picture i took of my yard the other day that has not been edited in any way, aside from the data transfer from the camera to the computer, and it also registered as a fake.


Simulation theory is looking better and better.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Aug 12 2017 09:37pm

nope it could totally tell the difference



next excuse?

ss or gg faker cause i did the same thing and got different results: a class 1 vs a class 4 image

make up more stuff plz

sexy car!

If you notice, i saved the image then re uploaded it, and then scanned it, which you can do now.

You can see it fails the test.

So, here we are, once again. This tool is poor for this exercise.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Aug 12 2017 09:47pm

You will never get them to understand basic science like positive and negative controls.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Aug 12 2017 09:54pm

look at all those 3000+ satellites that are apparently orbiting the earth in that image...

Yeah, I can't see any people either, so clearly the planet is vacant.

Flatearthlogic

so you copied my processed image and found out it processed - that's because i had to process it first through the image snoop with and then i had to take a ss (another process) paste it in more image processing it crop it again and then post it on another image hosting site which is more processing then you took a copy of it and hosted it on another site , more processing.

So it shows that where not show the real images - just processed ones. I wanna see a real image of earth.