oh you won't see for yourself - gg faker.

posting that 2 seconds after i post just shows your trolling

you can d/l the software yourself and check out images, dont expect everything on a silver spoon bitch

This post was edited by card_sultan on Aug 12 2017 09:13pm

Here is one that passed your little image test, and guess what, its a NASA image.



This post was edited by Ep0ch on Aug 12 2017 09:15pm

Also most of the images we get are cleaned up for clarity or resized/compressed/decompressed for data storage purposes, etc.

It's not some grand conspiracy to trick people into thinking the earth is something its not because reasons, its science.

Kinda defeats the purpose of using a mediocre tool like that.

I mean if you snap a picture with your own camera, then cropped it down a bit, it will read as processed.

Just a bad test imo.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Aug 12 2017 09:19pm

"Cleaned up for data storage"




This post was edited by card_sultan on Aug 12 2017 09:22pm

Even if you didn't alter the results, as I already stated, this program has no ability to tell the difference between a fake image created from scratch and an image that has been compressed/decompressed/cropped/etc.

Its a poor tool for discerning what images are real.



You can always do what I have done for years, use your own binoculars and telescopes to see the moon, its features, edges, if your very good, you can find the reflector plate.

Also most jets fly at 39k feet, you can see curvature at 35k, I have seen the curvature with my own eyes, more than once.

Which is why you should get on a plane to guam, tickets are cheap right now, and you can prove flat earth is false to yourself, once and for all.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Aug 12 2017 09:25pm

and why do you say that 2 seconds after i post that it shows the image is fake? Bias?



proof as to your claim?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Aug 12 2017 09:25pm

I said it before as well. I pointed out the flaw in the program you use right away.

Nasa has petabytes of data.

PETABYTES.

you think they aren't compressing for time/space?

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Aug 12 2017 09:29pm

you stated your opinion, i asked for proof - why do you continue to not understand the difference?

repost

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Aug 12 2017 09:36pm