perspective doesn't need both eyes to work, is the all seeing eye one or two. You can show perspective with a single lense camera, you cant show it with a 2d side view based on reality.
The reality is that the earth from a 2d side view is flat, we perceive it optically in 3d and not understanding the difference is why your are stuck in your learning.



please draw me a 4d hypercube, i need to laugh more ok



Exactly - lighthouses only work on a flat plane.



This post was edited by card_sultan on Apr 26 2018 04:52pm

this

Perspective needs to be explained mathematically and falsifiably.

does not work in reality, just in your mind.



So why aren't your mathematicians doing this, i guess they dont want you to understand that you are seeing a perspective , not a reality from line of sight opps.

Now, can you answer whether you think the horizon the result of the curve of the earth based on your 2d side view understanding of 3d optical perspective?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Apr 26 2018 04:58pm

i can point light at anything i want whether it's sphere or flat

My math explains the world just fine. Your math fails to account for an angle less than zero for the sun moving away when it is always above you if the Earth is flat.

'our' mathematicians prove globe earth....

plz get 'your' mathematicians to prove flat earth...

No thats not my math - that is a globe heads misunderstanding that a 3d optical view should be explain by your 2d misunderstanding, so its just reinforcing your incorrect understanding.

When you look at a row of telephone wires going down a road - and they appear to get smaller in the distance - it it because of perspective or because they are getting smaller IRL, your "oh the sun cant set on FE" drawing is based on a 2s side drawing without taking into account optical perspective , because you are taught to think stupid.




Sorry but a mathematically model that describes A reality does not infer that it describes OUR reality.

You cant even make water stick to a ball, you therefore have no working model

Fail more

This post was edited by card_sultan on Apr 26 2018 05:07pm

If light travels in a straight line then your "3d perspective" theory is dead on its feet and the 2d side view drawings I've shown are valid.

Our mathematicians have perfectly described perspective, you are proposing an alternate theory and have provided zero proof. You are proposing a model of 3d perspective that requires light to bend preferentially in one direction and never in the other, and you have no explanation for why light bends this way.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Apr 26 2018 05:09pm

2d side view drawing do not explain perspective, they do it to trick you into thinking you understand when you dont.
Your 2d side view reasoning of why the sun cant set on Flat Earth proves you dont understand the difference between reality and a real optical view.

Why does the ceiling inside a long hallway appear to be traveling down from the top of your view which is closer? Is it really going down or just appearing that way optically?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Apr 26 2018 05:30pm