Why would I waste my time without one or both of you agreeing it's a legitimate test? And agreeing to what results would invalidate your model?

Either the Ball model or the Fe is using the facts - if The spinning ball model isn't using facts what are they using - your low IQ?

Proposes a test

Balks on doing any actual testing with a troll excuse

Such a beta troll.

she squats bro

Same for the FE model
The theories are un proven thus are not fact

Again as before i dont care if you believe in FE and reject the GE model
You the one wanting us to accept your beliefs obvious by your insults and constantly returning to FE threads to propose theories and answer unbelievers

I just wont be accepting you beliefs since you have not proven them as facts

You expect people accept your theories as facts when you cant prove them, they often contradict other FE'ers and I have a low IQ?

This post was edited by kai_jph on Nov 4 2017 11:30pm

If you cant prove the Ball Earth is based on fact - no one needs to believe in that garbage.

Thanks for proving Flat Earth, good job.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 4 2017 11:30pm

You are the one that needs to prove FE on fact not the other way around. #noballs

You cant prove the FE is based on fact (again by your own admission) - no one needs to believe that either

You the one who keeps disproving FE along with Chivas since you 2 cant prove your theories and keep contradicting each other

This post was edited by kai_jph on Nov 4 2017 11:35pm

If you cant prove the Ball Earth is based on fact - no one needs to believe in that garbage.

Thanks for proving Flat Earth, good job.

I experience the world flat - if your telling me it's spinning around the milky way at 500,000 mph that's pretty extraordinary so please proof of your incredible beliefs with facts



If you cant prove the Ball Earth is based on fact - no one needs to believe in that garbage.

Thanks for proving Flat Earth, good job.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 4 2017 11:39pm