Quote (thesnipa @ Jan 9 2017 10:26am)
nah, pictures are just a part of the puzzle that i put together that doesn't involve me saying "conspiracy" as i jumble in pieces that don't fit. No part of the theory of a round earth requires a conspiracy that i can neither prove nor identify the scope of. Can you say the same?
So your back to thinking a picture is proof for you, what a shocker!
I guess you have a point, but you're not going to deny the existence of ewoks are you?
This picture may or not be real but you cant prove every picture of every ewok is fake and
ah ha - I'm not part of the Conspiracy to deny the existence of ewoks
Pawned......
Quote (russian @ Jan 9 2017 10:24am)
The water droplets are refracting the light. I thought that was common knowledge. It's a well-established and easily demonstrated fact that water refracts light.
If he was saying that rainbows are not produced through light refraction, then he's either saying that rainbows don't exist (unlikely, since they've been observed by just about everybody) or that rainbows are a product of some completely different mechanism than currently proposed by science. If that's the case, I'm open to hearing all about this mechanism and seeing the experiments supporting it. God knows we have enough of those for light refraction.
Omg watch your own video that you posted - the water isnt refracting the light - the curved material of the glass - made of glass is - glass is not water, ugg.
This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 9 2017 04:26pm