(Continues)

Second, to expand on the foregoing that feds aren't nearly as smart as either they or we think: You see, I have no proof but I bet the fed-selection process involves something where the interviewing feds ask prospective feds to break a law. Of course, there are detail and nuance to this process, but the end result is that people fail this test not because they are not smart enough to make the cut, but rather, it's because they are too ethical to be a fed. You see, to be a successful fed, you have to be 100% obedient to your superiors and be willing to break a law or otherwise do something questionable at their bidding, because frankly that's what these intelligence agencies are all about. The top people at these spook houses want someone who is not only smart, but also who lacks a moral compass and will do anything that is asked of them, without hesitation or moral qualms. So, if you applied to be a fed but got turned down, it doesn't mean you lost out to people more capable than you. No. It means you lost out to people who are less ethical than you. By the way, have you heard that jobs at the FBI are relational? What this really means that your skills and raw intelligence are secondary to your ability to suck up to and please your bosses, who are almost always Jews.

Third, feds are very, very unlikable people. They are elitist, smug and arrogant (without cause), and they are exact the kind of people whose faces you really want to satiate with punches. Talking to them is very very un-inspirational, which is another strange thing. Usually, truly intelligent people are also good at inspiring others, but feds absolutely fail at this. I think the reason for this is that they fundamentally lack noble thoughts in their hearts. Another thing these people do is that they will deliberately use big words, especially in their writing. If there are two words that can be used, they will go for the bigger one. For example, where "I agree" would have sufficed, they feel the compulsion to say "I concur", instead. Because, you see, not having people look up to them like they are some kind of gods is physically unbearable to them. These feds hope that if their writing is cryptic and hard to understand, people might start to think they are very smart and learned, something their egos desperately need. If their writing somehow winds up clear to understand for the average person, they feel that they have failed. It's like, normal people avoid using big words in their writing because they are afraid people might not understand it. Feds, on the other hand, use big words in their writing because they are afraid people might understand it.

Lastly, this ties into the feds' lack of a conscience. A lot of feds break laws without blinking. Feds routinely hack into people's computers without a warrant from a judge, and think nothing of it. They spy on law-abiding people without qualms. They infiltrate groups of people and see nothing wrong with it. When on an online forum, they quickly rise to the top, and become a moderator, so that they can obtain people's IP address, which facilitate more illegal monitoring. In fact, this ability to plot and scheme and machinate like that literally causes them to believe that they are very intelligent. By the way, they draw a salary funded by you while doing these things. Feds are very unethical, and they abuse technology. They use it for nefarious purposes. Take, computers and the internet. They don't ask themselves whether the should hack into people's computers and watch them. Instead, they ask themselves how to hack and watch people in better and better ways.

Also, in an feddy interview, fed bosses are exactly the kind of people who would be impressed by someone who has memorized an entire dictionary. To their puny minds, this person is a genius, haha. By the way, female feds, if they are white, tend to be mud sharks, and male feds, tend to have yellow fever. The rest of the feds who aren't white tend to be depraved, degraded animals. I talked to a Mexican female fed, who openly talked about how to get days-old literal cum out of her c*nt. I am serious, this really happened. we need to realize that feds are not normal people. They are very different from us, and in a very bad way.

How the feds lie with a clear conscience: If we ask if they secretly torture people, they will think to themselves, "What, torture? No, never. What we do is called enhanced interrogation. Therefore technically we don't torture". This is how they lie to us as well themselves.

(Continued)

Good read during my lunch time

(Continued)

As you interact with more feds, you will see more and more traits emerge that apply uniformly to all of them, and you should make note of this, and study it, because it will allow you to peer into the inner workings of a fed as well the feddy institution he belongs to. This is something that we don't normally get. However, because feds are now in all kinds of spaces (they are quietly panicking), be it in real life or online, now we the regular people have a chance to get to know them, understand them, and figure out how they work. Don't squander this opportunity.

With the FBI (and the like), I know they ask their employees to sign a non-disclosure agreement. However I am not too sure if they do this with job applicants, too. I mentioned this before, that I think it's very probable that the FBI, in their bid to find the perfect, completely obedient employee, ask potential hires to do something that is highly unethical, if not downright illegal, as a test. So basically they ask job applicants to do something that someone with a conscience would refuse to do. They use this to find people who will do whatever the FBI bosses ask them to do. So, let us put out a message to anybody who has ever tried to apply to the FBI to come forward and share their experiences. Like, in the selection process, did they immediately fail to advance to the next round when they refused to do something immoral? If nobody comes forward, it would prove that the FBI indeed doesn't do such a thing, then I will shut up about this forever. But if I am right? Then it's time to clean house.

What's going on here

ok

Gotta read them all to find out

Same ol same ol

Very soon, we will have the ability to engineer our genes, if we don't have it already. I am sure such technology will be abused by billionaires who, despite their great wealth, are actually very stupid and unimaginative people. They will probably engineer something stupid like new hair colors, or increase memory capacities in human such that people can hold as much info in their heads as computers, or making people not poop anymore. And this is because most people don't understand what a truly meaningful, significant change in genes is. I will give you one example of a truly significant change: The genes for compassion. We take compassion for granted, because it has been around for a long time and a lot of people have it. So we don't think much of it. However, when it first showed up in humans, it was a huge leap. Imagine a group of rough, hard-hearted hunter gatherers who were barely above animals. Suddenly, there was a genetic mutation in one person, and that person had compassion, unlike anybody else. He wasn't just different from all that were living at the time, he was different from all the humans that had ever lived before him. In that time, the trait of compassion was revolutionary, it was absolutely unheard of, something completely new. And it was not just new, it changed human behavior in a fundamental way. It became one of the defining characteristics of Homo Sapiens. So, when we use technology to alter our genes, we should keep this in mind. We want something truly monumental, not something stupid like cosmetic changes or minor tweaks on already-existing traits. Another idea related to genetic engineering is transhumanism. By tinkering with the human genes, we will essentially be creating a new kind of humans. They will likely not be Homo Sapiens anymore. But before we start this process, there are a few things we have to contend with. Namely, in order to distinguish a transhuman from a regular human, we first have to ask ourselves what a Homo Sapiens is. What is a human? What defines a human? What makes a human human? If we merely engineer the genes such that the new human will have no sweat glands, but everything else is the same, is he still a human? And what about making him extraordinarily kind, or extraordinarily evil? Would both still be Homo Sapiens? So as you can see, to contemplate changing the human genes is to be confronted with the very nature of our existence as a species.

By the way, I mentioned billionaires might wish to change our genes so as to give new hair colors, to greatly expand human memory capacities...etc, you know, various retarded and meaningless uses of genetic engineering which carries such great potential. However, this is if we are lucky. I am pretty sure some of them will attempt to create super soldiers. A new kind of humans who are exceptionally cruel, brutal and unsympathetic to cries of suffering.

same as what?

I remember seeing an ad on youtube from the CIA. I don't have any link, but it shouldn't matter. It doesn't matter what the content of the ad was, the very fact it's from the CIA should be reason enough to be suspicious of it. Anyway, the ad was just a bunch of CIA employees talking about what it was like to work in the CIA, with some purported supervisors thrown in, and they all talked in a way like they really had the human touch (The CIA? Human touch? You can't be serious.) So basically stuff that was so fake, it made you puke out yesterday's lunch. Needless to say, I didn't believe a word of it. Any ad, any information from a high-level government agency like that that is fit for public consumption, you shouldn't take too seriously. They will always frame everything in a really positive, rosy light. Don't get me wrong, I am curious about the CIA too, but I am simply not about to believe anything that they have deemed appropriate to disclose to the public. They will try hard to impress upon us that they are good people. But don't be fooled. They will never talk about their black sites and the professional assassins that they have on their un-official payroll (known as Staff D, look it up, but not in Wikipedia. Wikipedia tries their best to hide government dirt. They only talk about it when they have absolutely no other choice). In fact, this applies to any institution that operates under a veil of secrecy. The FBI is this way, and so are a lot of businesses. Don't believe a word out of their mouths. And certainly don't believe someone who works for the CIA. This is purely a PR campaign designed to bolster their fast fading public image.

Another thing about the professional terrorists that I read about: Someone said that a CIA agent once told him that, in a group of people, the one who talks the least is the most dangerous, because he is listening and taking in everything. I just want to say this utterly disgusts me. This fed from CIA thinks like a literal animal. Normal human beings think of other people as potential friends. They think about how to befriend them, to win them over as friends. Or if not that, then at least how to peacefully co-exist with them. They don't constantly think of other people as threats that need to be neutralized. Only animals think like that. I am not trashing the CIA, either. Rather, I say this because this is the truth. Think about it. When you see a roomful of people, do you pay attention to who is the most dangerous in the room? Do you think about how to neutralize people like that all the time? No, right? Normal people don't think like that. And I am sure this filthy fed is not the only one who thinks like that. I am quite sure the entire CIA is full of quasi-animals like that, but that's not the worst part. The worst part is that they probably believe acting ruthless like that actually makes them sexy. God, I am about to lose my dinner now. It's really hard to imagine people like that actually exist; I believe it is our God-given duty to spit on them ruthlessly till they are shaken out of their mistaken, quasi-psychopathic delusions about their sex appeal. But then again, it's the CIA, so what did you expect. Oh and by the way, feds are not only animals, they are actually very stupid, too. The most dangerous person in the room is not the most silent, observant one. It is the one who likes to talk, make jokes, and who makes other people laugh. You know, the popular, likable person. The kind that people would sing, "For he's a jolly good fellow", to. He is the most dangerous because he is both well-known and well-liked, and as such, he will be extremely tricky to murder, an activity that feds live for, next to women, and obscene amounts of money. I guess the feds' Jewish bosses, who trained them, haven't learned anything from the encounter their Pharisees ancestors had with Jesus. They forgot how hard their ancestors had to try, to get Jesus away from the crowds, so they could murder him. Tsk, tsk. Jews never learn.

More thoughts on feds in general:

If the public start to catch on to what they do, their response isn't to admit they have done wrong and then change their behavior. Instead they will try and think of better ways to conceal their future illegal/immoral acts from the public. And this is after they have vehemently denied it, unless there is overwhelming damning evidence, and even then, they will still try. Feds gonna fed.

By the way, we pay these feds their salaries. We shouldn't be afraid of them. We should be telling them what to do and how to serve us better.