Quote (Santara @ Aug 12 2017 11:14am)
That's because you can't seem to wrap your head around the fact that NASA IS the source material for the argument.
Example: photos by NASA of the Earth are faked CGI. This is an ad hom because you don't have any proof or actual reason for this statement, you take it as a truth "cuz NASA."
Nasa and Wiki are not a person. I will show the difference which you will fail to understand like much of anything:
person a: "Nasa said they went to the moon."
person b: ""you're a jerk and i dont need to believe anything you say"
that's ad- hominem
person a "Nasa said they went to the moon"
person b: Nasa uses cgi, green screen, front screen projection, wire work, Chroma key, wide angle lenses, photoshop, the vomit comet, VR reality, models
that's not ad-hominem
As usual your just blatantly wrong, i use to think you were a bit smarter than this but thanks for correcting my opinion. If you wanna believe that Nasa and Wiki are your personal friend it actually explains your cognitive dissonance, i hope you find cognitive harmony though.
This post was edited by card_sultan on Aug 12 2017 03:46pm