THats what im saying - your proof we live on a spinning ball rocket is parroting stuff from popular science mags

you cant see beyond the propaganda and never will

Tell me why do you think Neil Armstrong said in his speech to grads that astro-nots are parrots who cant fly and there are discoveries beyond truth's protective layer.

Try to break down those words and explain to me who you think you know the absolute truth, ok?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 3 2017 04:01pm

Your much more amusing when your trying to explain away objective observable physical realities with vague pseudoscience doublespeak than when your spewing adhoms card

So what your objective physical reality proof of gravity - some mathemagician showed you some numbers?



And if wanna see some real doublespeak and pseudoscience - research the big bang theory - the tv show is the only thing real about it

This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 3 2017 04:06pm

What you call "parroting," I call objective, verifiable fact. It's not just that I BELIEVE the things these "popular science mags" say, it's that random everyday people can go out and perform experiments that confirm what they say. Normal, regular people launch high altitude balloons and show off the Earth's curvature, and they don't have curved lenses on their cell phones. Anyone can, with a little ingenuity, build their very own Foucault pendulum. Normal, regular people have gone out and debunked the "you shouldn't be able to see XXXX mountain from YYYY" videos. They debunk it for fun. No one even has to pay them. They just want the world to have a little more truth in all the bullshit people like you throw into the wind.

There you go again, more innuendo. "Propaganda." "Astro-nots."

Instead of saying what Armstrong says, IN CONTEXT, you leave the conclusion hanging, saying to everyone who'll listen "See, see? What does THAT tell you???" Nothing but innuendo. There's no factual basis with you. That's because you're fact averse.

Do she got a flat booty or a round booty?

The world is flat.

so you just dodged explaining what Neil meant - i guess you'll have to wait till an article in Popular science tells you

Go Go Propagandanauts.



This is your proof we live on a spinning ball rocket - this is exactly what your doing by attacking the person and not having an actual point.
Way to carry the torch From NASA aka Never A Straight Answer.



I know - i doubt even God himself coming down and flatsmaking these die hard statists would even be enough to wake them up, they would be like

No No God your wrong - see this Apple fell on Newton's head and this proves there is a magic force you just cant see it.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Nov 3 2017 06:28pm

booty is round

We have had this discussion a few times in the last thread.
I dont care what you believe in. If you want to believe in the FE model so be it.

However I wont be joining you in your belief since you have no proof by your admission

In the past few pages you have called me a f****** moron, fag and low IQ for believing in the ge and not fe model
You clearly are the one wanting me to accept your point of view



We have a clue, lets continue.

Do you also agree that with the laws of p and c the further you get from an object the smaller it will get until it converges into the vanishing pt like this pic



This post was edited by kai_jph on Nov 3 2017 09:50pm