(Continued)

8. Non-white immigrants will tend to support the more liberal position (aka the position that Jews want), in any aspect of the ongoing culture war. For example, imagine an alternative newspaper that has just appeared on the scene. It reports things that are inconvenient to the establishment. Naturally Jews will go after the paper, but they might encounter resistance. For example, if they try to sue the paper, the judge who will be presiding over the case might be white, and he might rule in the paper's favor because he does not find anything wrong with its reporting. But, if the judge is non-white, he is more likely to be disturbed by any content that deviates from official narratives, and will rule against the paper. Jews want such allies in their ongoing war against white people.


9. Another consequence of non-white immigrants competing for jobs is that money will become very hard to come by. So now, a white person will have to do things that he is normally unwilling to do, in order to survive. In the past, a white person would refuse to do something that was, say, humiliating. And that is because he could afford to do so. He would just move on from a job that would cost him his dignity to one that didn't. And Jews hate this. They want the money they have to have maximum power over white people. They want to be able to ask a white person to do something beneath his dignity and he will do it. He can't say no, because it would mean he would starve. I have seen something similar in real life. It was at a food bank. A staff member was shouting at a client (someone who receives food), and he felt humiliated so he threw down his food bank card and said he would never set foot in that food bank again. But later, he picked up the card, apologized to the staff member, and just generally begged for forgiveness. Now, I am not saying that the staff member was Jewish or that he was intentionally trying to humiliate the client. But rather, it shows the principle that when someone has very little money, his dignity will be the first to go. He has to swallow his pride and put his dignity aside, because it's either that or starvation. And Jews know this. Incidentally, this is also why we see so many cases where white women turn themselves into literal whores. Whether it's being a cam whore, or being a sugar-babe, or even outright prostitution. There has been such competition for jobs and money that more and more white women are considering selling their bodies. Of course, this is a bit of over-simplification. I know that some of them just want easy money to live the high life. But what we can't deny is that when money is scarce, people (not just women) will often resort to occupations that are degrading, just to live.

While we are on the subject of money and women:

Most guys think that the way to a girl's heart is through being nice to her, buying her flowers, gifts, meals...etc. Showering her with stuff and just generally being good to her. This is the thought process of a typical dude, or as Jews would call him, a sucker. Jews don't bother with any of that. Now let me tell you how Jews "court" white girls. We all know that Jews promote non-white immigration. They demand white people give jobs to immigrants. What this means is a lot of white girls are now poorer, because a lot of jobs have gone to immigrants. Some white girls have even become impoverished. Now that they are much poorer, suddenly a Jew and his deep pocket start to look very attractive. Jews do this to ensure their boys get a better chance at landing a beautiful white girl. Jew boys and men compete against their main competitor, the white guy. They know that by being kind to white girls as a whole, giving them money, giving them jobs and things like that, it only makes them financially better off, and the end result is that they (the white girls) will have much greater freedom in selecting a mate. And they might very well choose a white guy over a Jew. Therefore, Jews deliberately impoverish white girls so as to give themselves an edge. Jews don't just impoverish white girls, they impoverish white guys, too, (see above where I explained why Jews want mass non-white immigration). Keeping the white population poor means white guys would have less wealth to impress white girls with. This leads to lower rates of white marriages. In cases where a white guy does successfully land a white girl, they will lack the money to have a lot of white babies. These are all wins for Jews.

Here I wish to talk about the CIA and plausible deniability

So basically, plausible deniability is a concept that the CIA uses a lot. In simple terms, it is a shield that the CIA uses that helps high-ranking officials, such as presidents, or army generals, basically important people in really, really high positions, to evade responsibility, any time something wrong, bad, immoral or illegal that they knew was going on and gave permission to, is exposed. You can look up the concept if you are not familiar with it, by Googling "CIA and plausible deniability".

Now, I just want to say how incredibly bad that an organization that is like the CIA, would do something like this. You know, focusing energy (it doesn't matter how much, because even one tiny little ounce of strength spent on crap like this, is too much, because it is just so bad, and inexcusable). An organization like the CIA is, or should be, tasked with protecting the interests of the nation. If they can't do that very well, which actually wouldn't be their fault, because being stupid really isn't anybody's fault, nobody chooses to be stupid, nevertheless when they knowingly choose to do something like this, you know, pouring efforts into helping presidents evade responsibility, then it is a deliberate act. The CIA is deliberately doing something bad. Something that someone in their position should just know is bad. The integrity, and spirit, of an organization such as the CIA, should be beyond reproach. They are one of the highest levels of intelligence agencies of the country, on par with the FBI, if not higher. They should be not just smarter than the regular people, but also better. Better as in, better people. They should be people who are more honorable, more moral, more ethical, more scrupulous, more honest, more willing to take responsibility, more offended by anything that's wrong, bad, evil...etc, you get my point. But, look at the stuff that they actually do. Instead of holding presidents' feet to the fire, watching presidents to see if they are doing something bad, and if they are, catch them, expose them to the whole nation...etc, because, you know, that'd be the honorable, right thing to do. But instead, they essentially said to presidents, "Don't worry about anything, boss. Go ahead and torture as many Iraqis you want, or assassinate whoever you want, or spy on as many Americans as you want, or perform as many secret, unethical medical experiments on unwitting people as you want, we got you covered. We will use our superior intellect, to design a thing for you where you can be free to commit as many wrongful acts as you want, and if you get caught, you will easily be able to wriggle free. After all, that's what we the CIA is for, is it not?"


I would get mad and call this whole plausible deniability thing a pile of fucking CIA garbage, except I won't, because I already know about the nature of this organization. This is exactly something that they would do. It's extremely disgusting and repugnant, but expected. Nothing about it surprises me. What it does reveal to me though, is that in our current society, the wicked, the immoral, the unethical, the unscrupulous, tend to rise to the top. And believe me the CIA is at the very top. It doesn't get more top than the CIA. I don't know the exact mechanism of how this comes to be (although you should try and figure it out, if you can), the only thing I know is that this is indeed how things seem to work. And if you will think about this a bit, I believe you will reach the same conclusion as me. Everywhere in our world, the greedy, the shameless, the aggressive, the unempathetic, the arrogant, the quasi-psychopathic, the pathologically ambitious, they all have an edge over good, honest people. Anyway, this is a rather big topic that I don't want to get into; for now, I want to talk about why the CIA seems to attract not only the brightest, but also the most evil. And the reason is the people at the very top, who are almost all Jews, are evil themselves. Evil people like to surround themselves with other evil people, because that's what humans do. Good people like to associate with other good people, and so do evil people like to associate with other evil people. That's just how it is. And I am not just saying this to defame the feds, I mean, go to a site as biased as Wikipedia and even there you will see a long list of extremely immoral activities that the CIA engages in. By the way, before some tool starts screaming about how i don't have evidence for any of the alleged CIA wrongdoings, well, that's true. I don't have enough evidence to convict them in a court of law, however, we are not in a court of law. Here we are in the court of public opinion. In this court, rules are a bit more relaxed. I can talk about allegations and suspicions, and I don't need to prove anything whatsoever. The only thing I need to do is show people that for an organization such as the CIA, the fact that there are even rumors and allegations of this kind against them, it is extremely serious, and it is inexcusable. Further, it also tells us that we really, really need to investigate whether the CIA does indeed engage in immoral, if not downright illegal, activities.

(Continues)

(Continued)


By the way, I don't know if you guys are familiar with the concept of security clearance in the context of intelligence communities. So basically, it's about allowing agents access to information, based on how much they can be trusted. The more sensitive the information is, the more the agent would need to prove himself trustworthy in order to earn the necessary clearance, so that's the basic gist of it. Or that's what they tell us. I have never ever worked for an intelligence agency, but I bet that security clearance and the granting of it are actually based on how black the agent's heart is. As in, when they say sensitive information, what they really mean is really nasty stuff that the agency does, that the public absolutely cannot know about, so they came up with a neutral-sounding term to describe it. When they say an agent has proven himself "trustworthy" enough, what they really mean is that he has proven himself evil enough, psychopathic enough, to not be bothered by the evil stuff that his organization does. The people in charge (almost always Jews) couch it in a language that sounds reasonable to the gullible (meaning the general public, but especially white people). You know, an agent has to earn enough trust to be allowed access to sensitive info. It makes sense, right? Yes, to the public, aka, the easily fooled. But actually, the above is a bit of an over-simplification. What really happens, is that Jews, the ones who invariably rise to the very top in evil organizations like the CIA (by the way, what does this say about Jews?), want people who are selectively psychopathic. They want people who are psychopathic in their dealings with everybody else, but when it comes to Jews, suddenly their hearts become soft, tender, and full of love. You see, nobody likes to deal with outright psychopaths. Actual, real, bona-fide, indiscriminate psychopaths are a real liability anywhere, not just in life but in the intelligence communities as well. That's why Jews don't like them. But, psychopaths have one huge thing going for them: They have no conscience and can be relied upon to do extremely nasty things, something that is a huge asset to the CIA. So this is why Jews in the CIA have devised a system to screen for people who are just the right kind of psychopaths. Or, as I call them, selective psychopaths.

By the way, the whole Kissinger being pathologically, malignantly, metastatically abnormal thing is actually not strictly due to the fact that he was Jewish. I mean yes, it plays a part, but it's not the only reason. The true reason is that, ever since humans have gotten out of the Ice Age, where the environment was harsh, and they had had to work together to overcome the environment, they now have to work against and overcome other humans, in the quest for survival. When you have to fight against the environment, the people will evolve into kind, likable, cooperative, sensitive, intelligent, creative at finding solutions, physically beautiful, and a whole host of really desirable traits. But when you have to fight against other humans, which is the situation that Jews' ancestors found themselves in, then you will get the complete opposite of the above. So, Kissinger's perversion is repulsive and sad, but not at all un-expected. In fact, go read the history of other non-white people, and you will find similar stories to Jews. The Chinese is a really good starting point. In fact, it's an excellent study, because the Chinese started out really nice, kind and desirable, just like white people. But over time, the gene pool deteriorated, people got physically uglier and behaviorally nastier, due to the principle I mentioned earlier. So now you have basically Aryan-like people fighting against Jew-like people in one country, for dominance. Note how I say dominance instead of survival, even though dominance is not really the right word? I do this because technically people aren't really fighting for survival in the literal sense. The conditions are now much milder, humans don't really need to struggle to live anymore. Instead, they struggle against one another for "dominance" in the sense that they want their particular way of life to win. The good people want their Way to prevail, and the bad people want their Way to prevail. If good people win, then a lot of good things will happen, the chief among which is that there will be a huge increase in human (and sometimes even animal) happiness. If bad people win, then the opposite will happen.

Enough about that. Now, back to the security clearance thing. I just want to comment on how it has always struck me that almost every federal agent just accepts the whole concept of security clearance, without questioning much. By that, I don't mean questioning why one should earn the trust before one can be allowed access to more sensitive info. I mean, that sounds perfectly reasonable; if I were a fed, I'd agree with it, too. But, what most people don't seem to ask is, who gets to decide who is trustworthy enough? In other words, who should be granted more clearance? What criteria do the authority use to determine that and what if I don't agree with these criteria, and this is assuming that they would care enough to tell me about the criteria in the first place; who gets to decide what's sensitive information or not? And who were the people who came up with the idea of security clearance any way? Furthermore, who are these people who are on top, how did they get there, and are they always well-meaning, good people whom I should trust and follow? All of these questions are important, and even though they are not immediately connected to one's ability to do a good job as a fed, nevertheless, they still have value because they are philosophical in nature. One should always wonder, and always ponder, and always ask questions, even though such questions do not yield immediate benefits to one and in some cases, might never yield any answers, either. But one should always ponder. However, most don't. This actually has little to do with white people being stupid or unthinking or overly trusting of authority or any of that. But rather, it's a problem with most people. Most humans are stupid and unthinking and overly trusting of authority. This is why Jews are able to rule over so much of humanity with such ease, it's not because they are smart, but rather, it's because people are stupid.

(Continues)

(Continues)

Now I want to switch gear briefly, and talk about the Bible. Now, I just want to let people know that regardless of whether they are Christian or not, what we can't deny is that the Bible is not entirely religious. It has some parts that are historical, as well. For example, regardless of whether you believe in Jesus' divinity, he was also an actual person that actually lived. Similarly, the Pharisees were also actual people that actually lived. So the key thing for us to do is to read the Bible with a critical eye. The parts that are obviously mythological in nature, we can ignore. Other parts that deal with actual history, we should study. Now. The Pharisees, had always wanted Jesus dead. I won't get into the reasons, but just know that they hated his guts. Now, Jesus was a very popular teacher, he had a huge following of people. He was constantly approached by people, and people were always with him. So, it became tricky, delicate business to murder him, because you would need to get him away from the crowd first. And that is what the Pharisees did, and the rest is history. The Pharisees, were the literal ancestors of modern-day Jews. They share the same blood, in other words, they share the same genes. They are essentially the same people. And what's significant is that today's Jews do things that are just like what the Pharisees would have done, under the same circumstances. For example, I have no doubt that Jews badly want to murder me. But, because there is a crowd, not a crowd in the sense of a crowd in the streets, but a crowd of people watching me online nevertheless. The only difference is that now we have technology and the way I am being watched is facilitated through technology, however the basic, underlying idea is still the same. One has to be very careful in one's attempt to murder someone that people are highly aware of. The point I am driving at is, even though technology has greatly advanced, human nature really hasn't changed much in the past 2000 years. Jews are still a murderous people with blackened hearts, and white people are still kind, tender-hearted, and a bit stupid. Keep this principle in mind. Next time, a new technology comes out, and you are not sure what to expect from the Jew-run government? Just ask yourself, "How can I use this new technology in a way that will harm white people in the worst way possible", and then you will be able to anticipate Jews' moves with almost 100% certainty. Take, for example, the whole reverse RNA technology thing. The actual details of the technology are not important, rather, what's important is that Jewish nature hasn't changed, and the only thing they could think of is how they could use this new technology to harm white people in the worst way possible. And that's how we got the Covid "vaccines" and why they try so hard to push them on white people.

By the way, I personally recommend that you read the Bible, even if you are not a Christian. By reading the Bible, you can actually learn a lot about how Jews operate (through studying their ancestors, the Pharisees), the kinds of things they do and believe, and the mentality behind it. It's like I said, the Bible is not entirely mythological; it has some real, historical parts to it. I find it particularly useful to study the dynamics between the Pharisees and Jesus. It really shows why they hated him so much, and wanted him dead so much. Normally it's not easy to know what Jews really think and feel, because they have evolved to hide their true feelings. However, the Bible was really ancient, it was written 2000 years ago, back when Jews haven't really started to live among white people yet, so they haven't evolved into the evil, guarded villains that they are today. It is also very enlightening to study the Old Testaments, again, not for the religious content, but for clues about the Jewish mind. Another thing you should look at, is the teachings of Jesus. I would recommend that you study these teachings, and try to see how they have worked, to preserve the Europeans, not just spiritually, but also genetically. It is not easy to be a good person, not today, not 2000 years ago. It seems that bad people always have an edge over good people, and for a while, things were looking really gloomy. It seemed that good people were destined to be driven out of this world, until Jesus came on the scene. So, please read the Bible, and study Jesus' teachings. Not from a religious perspective, but from a biological perspective. Think about how these teachings work together with the Bible, to give good people a fighting chance against bad people.

(Continued)

(Continues)

Now, I want to talk a bit about how Jews evolved to be full of hate for white people. I am a non-white myself, as you all know, and my experience here in the West, is of course, non-white in nature. So, in a lot of ways, I know how Jews' ancestors must have felt, because we went through very similar things. Now. I remember when I was in university, there was a white man in one of my classes. I won't get into the details, but he showed extreme contempt towards me, completely unprovoked, in a way that was simply unbearable. I didn't end up doing anything about it, but that's not the point. The important thing isn't whether I should have followed him outside of class and then beat the crap out of him, or just stew in anger and bear it. Rather, my point is, if my people and I had to deal with something like this, which must have occurred for Jews because it was 2000 years ago, back when there was some real, serious antisemitism, then the only people among us that could have survived and passed on our genes, had to be people who bore a natural hatred for white people. A hatred so strong that it completely ignored the humanity of white people, and it sought to harm them, at whatever cost. You think I am exaggerating to make Jews sound bad? No. I am not. I am telling you this is not only how things were, it is also the only way things could have been. When you as a people have lived, for thousands of years, among people who hated your very existence and did not try to hide it, the only way you could have lived through that and reproduced, is if you also developed hate back against them. Otherwise, you and your genes would have been absorbed into the white gene pool, since they were the dominant group and surrounded you because they were so numerous. Try and imagine. If a white person comes up to me, spits on my face, kicks me in the gut, tells me I am a worthless fucking chink and I should just go back to China, and every other white person does the same thing, do you think it's likely I will be absorbed into the white gene pool? Do you think I will gladly marry a member of a group of people who clearly hate me so much and who have abused me so much? No, right? It's logical. The only way I could have prospered and passed on my genes, is by associating with other Chinese people, who have had the same experience and who probably also hate white people's guts, too. Now you do this for enough generations, and it should become obvious to you that me and my people will eventually turn into a people whose existence is defined by their hate for white people. This is what happened to Jews. This is why they hate white people so insanely, so unbelievably much. And it's because they could not have evolved any other way.

Now, I want to talk about the CIA's famous brainwashing program. Other similar concepts exist, such as mind control. The exact details of these things aren't important, the only thing important is that they are all of Jewish in origin. Jews love to change the way white people think, for various reasons. The chief reason is so that they will be allowed to live in the west, despite their obvious harmful impact on white people. Another reason is that they want their alien way of thinking and their obsessive love for money, which is normally repulsive to white people, to be accepted, and even celebrated, by white people. This is done for purely psychological reason. I mean, nobody wants to hear other people denigrate key aspects of oneself. One wants to be praised for one's way of thinking and doing things and approaching the world, especially if other people are good-looking, which white people are. This brings me to the third reason. Jews want to brainwash beautiful white girls (who are usually blond, though sometimes redheaded, too. Jews love everything white) into marrying them and having babies with them. Normally, white girls only want to marry white guys, because of two reasons: 1. Because white guys are familiar. People tend to only want to date and marry with one of their own, just like how the Chinese only want to marry other Chinese; and 2. white guys are simply superior to Jews in every way. I know this is highly subjective and we could debate "who is truly superior" till the cows come home, so I am not going to do that. Instead, I will simply tell you from my experience as a heterosexual woman that, the fact that white guys are superior to Jews is pretty much self-evident to me. It's as self-evident as fire is hot, and that water is wet. I don't care to prove it to anybody, I just know it to be true. So, normally, white girls don't want anything to do with Jews. But, Jews want to have sex with white girls. They can't just go out there and rape white girls (although they did do this during the world wars), because white guys would put them in jail. So, they have to do it another way. They have to brainwash, not just white girls into wanting to date them, but also white guys, into believing that somehow Jews gaining sexual access to white girls is a totally OK thing. Jews cannot physically conquer white people, white people are too numerous, plus they are too militarily strong, for Jews to be able to subdue them in a fair, out-in-the-open fight. So, they have to resort something like brainwashing, mind-control...etc. A related phenomenon is gas-lighting, which is something Jews use heavily. By the way, the same principle is also what's behind the idea of asymmetrical warfare, which Jews love so much. They know that they are small in number and weak in strength, so they use every other dirty trick ever known to humanity, to fight against white people and win and survive. If you are unfamiliar with the concept of asymmetrical warfare, I recommend you look it up. Then look at what Israel does to "defend" itself. And you will find lots of similarities.

(Continues)

I mentioned that Jewish nature hasn't changed, and any time a new technology comes out, they can only think about how to use it to harm white people. Now I want to talk about something related. And it is this: we humans have developed technology. And it's because we have acquired lots of knowledge, which makes technology possible. One thing about knowledge is that it accumulates and grows. With each passing generation of humans, knowledge grows and grows, and accumulates and accumulates. Now, we have a lot of knowledge, which gives us technological advances, which in turn, give us almost God-like power, since it's been thousands of years that we've been acquiring knowledge and developing technology. However, human nature hasn't changed. Human nature is not like knowledge, it does not grow and grow with each successive generation. It stays the same generation after generation. In fact, we are lucky if our nature doesn't become more and more evil with each passing generation, like what happened with Jews. So, in the best case scenario, our human nature is still stuck in the same way it was for our hunter-gatherer ancestors in terms of morality and ethicalness. Yet, our abilities have become insanely great. This is very bad. For the simple reason that god-like abilities should be accompanied by god-like ethicalness, so that they will not be mis-used. This concept is not hard to grasp. Take, for example, computers. Not saying that it's a god-like power, but, it is a form of very advanced technology. Now, if humans had god-like ethicalness to go with this new power, then we would not have people illegally and unethically hacking into people's computers. But of course, we all know some people do that. This just goes to show my principle that when you have advanced technology, but human nature has stayed the same, then inevitably the technology will be mis-used and sometimes, it ends up harming another human being.

I remember this crime story I read about many years ago. A dentist used his dental tools, to torture a victim, so as to get him to give up his bank account info. As we all know, having one's teeth drilled is an incredibly painful experience. When I first heard this story, I got incredibly upset. Not just at how evil the dentist was, but also, at how powerless, frightened, and confused the victim must have felt. If I was victimized in a "normal" way, say, I was being beaten up by fists, yes it sucks, yes it's bad, but at least it's something that I sort of know how to deal with. In our evolutionary past, we have been beaten by fists before. We know what it is and some of us know how to defend themselves against it. But how do you deal with victimization that is backed by years of technology, technology that is so powerful and impossible to defend oneself against, because very intelligent people have poured their energies into developing it, over a long period of time? How would I deal with having my teeth drilled into? This is very unlike being beaten up by fists, or even by a lesser tool/technology, such as being beaten up by a baseball bat. Human evil is always boundless, but when that evil is aided by technology, then truly, humans tremble helplessly in its face. And I can assure you, as more and more technology comes out, there will only be more and more cases of people being harmed in ways that they cannot even comprehend.

I feel that something must be done about it. It is not possible to halt the progress of technology, so, I must do it another way. I propose that we tinker with humans' genes such that we will now become much, much, much more ethical. Now, with more and more new technology that comes out, we won't have to worry about people using it to victimize and terrorize other humans in increasingly frightful and incomprehensible ways. We will now not just be god-like in power, but we will also be god-like in our ethicalness. We will pair our technology with a new and improved conscience that works much better, that watches the technology, and prevents it from being used for evil purposes. This is the way forward, and the only way forward.

Some have wondered how white people's intellectual capacities, achievements and various abilities have come to be. They seem quite "excessive", in the sense that they are not strictly needed for survival. Some speculate that these are due to runaway sexual selection, where females show great preference for males that exhibit those traits. I have an alternative explanation that does not involve female sexual preference. You see, back in the environment where white people's ancestors evolved, the conditions were very harsh, and they needed a lot of outstanding abilities and traits in order to survive. Intelligence, naturally, was very much needed. Long-term planning was needed. Social cohesion was needed, as people needed the cooperation and help from one another, in order to survive. As such, a whole host of traits that promoted social cohesion evolved, such as a trusting nature, and an innate desire for friendship. Hunters of that time needed to be able to orient themselves to the lay of the land, and to be able to memorize hunting routes, and thus, the ability to appreciate the beauty in the environment evolved, because this helped the early hunters to navigate the land better and to be able to find their way homes easier. The concept of the sanctity of life arose because it was important that people valued human life. Each human took resources to raise, and resources were very hard to come by and therefore precious. If people didn't value human lives and just killed people casually, it was very costly in terms of resources. I could go on, but the principle is that all these things that we currently see that seem to be extra and not strictly needed, were in fact needed back then. But now we live in a much milder, much more forgiving environment. However, these evolved traits do not simply go away, they are still with white people today. So what we see is that these now superfluous traits, manifest themselves as forces that make complex societies and eventually civilizations possible. Think about the traits I mentioned earlier. I will show you the role they play in our current world. Raw intelligence now does not help white people survive anymore but instead becomes the force by which they gain knowledge. It is the reason universities exist and why human knowledge is able to grow and grow, which helps improves people's quality of life in many ways. Long-term planning allows white people to anticipate events and this prevents problems before they happen. White people's trusting nature makes mega cities possible, because mega cities are full of strangers and without a trusting nature, people would be on guard all the time around strangers and society would grind to a halt. There are friendly feelings between white people because they have a desire for friendship, and this makes cooperation and then eventually collaboration on a grand scale possible. And we all know how useful large-scale collaboration is. And the clean, beautifully kept environments are only possible because white people have a appreciation for the beauty found in the natural world; they like things clean and orderly and pleasing to the eyes. This makes societies in the West a delight to live in. The sanctity of life translates into laws forbidding murder. This makes society peaceful and living with other people in close quarters possible. It gives people a sense of security that they are safe as they move about in the society. I could go on, but you get the idea. The thing to take away is that whatever used to help white people's ancestors survive is now no longer strictly necessary, but it remains with them nevertheless. And now it manifests itself as the force that makes world-class societies and amazing civilizations possible. And please don't think that the traits I mentioned above are the only important ones; there are a lot more traits that are just as important. I was just giving a few of the more obvious ones. In fact, as a fun thought exercise, challenge yourself to think of more traits that contribute to Western civilization, and I bet you can work backwards to their origin and see how they could have helped white people's ancestors survive on Mount Caucasus.

Not enough

I have the misfortune of having dealt with bona fide feds both online and in real life, for a really long period of time, so I have learned a few things about them.

First thing: these men all think that they are hot shit, when in fact they are completely, thoroughly, absolutely ordinary. Don't get fooled into thinking that they are smart. These people think that just because they have managed to stuff a lot of knowledge into their craniums which they can recall at will and that they have a phenomenal memory (This is a big one. Feds really, really believe that having an extraordinary memory is the true mark of intelligence, haha), that this must mean that they're smart. This is really, really laughable. News to you feds: it's not about how much you know, it's about how you manipulate what you do know. In a sense, these feds are very similar to those we would find in left-wing circles. They all
think that if they know a few things about the computer, can balance a few equations in a math or chemistry course, can spew a few big words, know a few facts, that it means they're only a few IQ points short of Einstein. And to prove the above, ask yourself: when was the last time a fed was lauded for making a contribution to the advancement of human thoughts and endeavors? And I don't mean the Nobel prize. Very few people can win this prize, and it's fine if the feds can't. But I am asking you why we just automatically assume feds are smart when the observable reality is that they really haven't done anything noteworthy, academically speaking. The only thing they are good at is hacking into people's computers and then spying on them from a distance (without a warrant), and occasionally bursting out of their offices to harass lawful people in real life (this is known as gang-stalking. Look it up; this is what your government spends your tax money on). Moreover, feds' intelligence is overhyped. They just all congratulate one another over their supposed superior intellect, which is all self-diagnosed and measured according to criteria that they themselves came up with, not the ones normal people use. I get it, it can be hard to assess intelligence, because different people can have different ideas on how to measure it, and how to define it. So here's the criterion I personally use that I think is reasonably objective: you are truly intelligent, if you are still being talked about in textbooks, 200 years after your death. As you can see, this means nobody will ever be able to find out in their life-time. So this allows feds to fool themselves and the world into thinking they are intellectual powerhouses; because reality simply hasn't had the chance to correct them. And I am not saying the feds are dumb people, I mean obviously they aren't, but they just compare themselves to the average person and then start to get a raging hard-on thinking they are now geniuses. This is why when they are confronted with someone who is truly intelligent, they become confused, disoriented, and they don't know what to do. By the way, the feds also genuinely think that they are fine judges of other people's level of intelligence. This one really, really makes me laugh. For one very simple reason: one can only detect the level of intelligence of someone less intelligent, or equally intelligent, as one. Someone who is genuinely more intelligent than one, is beyond one's understanding. Just like how you and I would have no way of knowing just exactly how smart Einstein is, if we met him. So, this means when they encounter true geniuses who slipped through detection, they have to have meeting upon emergency meeting about what to do about them. Occasionally they also have brainstorming sessions on how to detect such true intelligence in the future. And trust me, their wanting to be able to identify geniuses is not for humanitarian reasons, as in, they are not doing it to foster people's abilities so that they can contribute to human advancement. Feds do this because they are control freaks. They want to be in control of everything, everybody, every situation, all the time. It's like I said, freaks.

(Continued)

Mrs Wang can you please go outside and touch some grass.