How is attacking WIKI - ad hom. Ad hom is when an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument.

Are you claiming to be wiki? See this is the problem with your faith - your entire self worth is so invested in what you are told to believe, never knew you lived in a glass house.

See the edit. You attacked NASA, which is the actual source of the information. You ad hom'd.

In a terry pratchett cartoon? Its a pretty old joke, it probably why they invented the magic force of gravity, that nobody can prove.

It is a nice Jedi mind trick to get all the Agent Smith and Atlas wannabes to believe.

is he standing on the tortoise?

No, id call NASA claiming they went to the moon 6x with calculator technology and in a tin foil box with shower curtain rods attached , travelling 240,000 miles while bringing live Kodak asa 100 film through both Van allen belts as well as the plasmasphere twice, more than a bit suspicious. And then not being able to do that again for 45 years because you claim you lost the technology, kinda revealing.

I wouldn't dream of Ad-hom'ng your precious Military propaganda wing, id call it questioning. You buy their excuses no matter how ridiculous, i dont have too.

Like that story that Chris Hadfield told on Conan O'Brien about wearing the same underwear for a month on the iss and throwing it out the hatch. Hey look up, is that a bird? a plane. Oh no, its the attack of the crusty Underwear from space!

There's actually another Atlas underneath him and hes holding a tray i think, its like that all the way down.

Oh! I see!

Fine but that contradicts the geometric model which states the sun, moon and planets rotate around the earth

I take this post of yours with the flat earth in George lucas logo is garbage then?
http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=76076001&f=27&o=10

This post was edited by kai_jph on Aug 11 2017 12:35pm

As well this opening diagram of Bill Nye from this Vid you posted


http://forums.d2jsp.org/topic.php?t=76076473&f=27&o=100

This post was edited by kai_jph on Aug 11 2017 01:15pm

That may or may not be George lucas's belief on the model that comes from the Hebrew Bible, it is certainly a viable FE model but not the only one.

He also made a movie with Ewoks in it , but does that mean he believes that Ewoks exist?

You should probably ask George Lucas if you really want to know exactly what he thinks.

One of the things ive noticed is how many silly people cannot separate a cartoon from the person who posted the cartoon. Or if i question Nasa, people take it personally, and then feel justified to personally attack me and then feel they have debunked FE. So if you hate me, you dont need to understand that their may be another model that is far more correct? It really reveals a giant flaw in their thinking, more like they dont actually think, its almost like they were programed to think that way.......

If i question any of these things like space or Nasa, why do people become personally offended, did they ever go to space, did they make the map, did they invent gravity. Its like they claim it's not faith but then are personally offended when you call it faith, proving that it was faith all along. Yup, people are definitely strange.

one of the things i never mentioned as to why hide the truth was to understand that ignorance of the law is not an excuse, whether or not you choose to believe is your choice - but you cant claim you weren't given a choice - thats all up to you.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Aug 11 2017 01:16pm