d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Globe Earth
Prev156575859601933Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Views: 222419Replies: 19328Track Topic
Member
Posts: 2,391
Joined: Mar 7 2007
Gold: 410.00
#571
Nov 3 2017 01:23pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 4 2017 08:21am)
So not believing in a pseudo force is crazy? That what all blue pill curverts say to stay in your Heliocult.


sure dude... you cant argue with stupid so im not gona try
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#572
Nov 3 2017 01:25pm
Quote (lukesfish @ Nov 3 2017 09:23am)
sure dude... you cant argue with stupid so im not gona try


Can't prove gravity, ya its stupid to have faith in the pseudo force.
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
#573
Nov 3 2017 01:31pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 3 2017 02:25pm)
Can't prove gravity, ya its stupid to have faith in the pseudo force.


Says the guy whose belief in FE is due to belief in a particular sky pixie.

Prove table or GTFO
Member
Posts: 23,832
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
#574
Nov 3 2017 01:39pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 3 2017 09:16pm)
After you prove the spinning ball rocket - we both experience the world as flat so the burden of proof is on you to prove its not flat.


you are unable to prove any of the theories you proposed in your own words
"Infinite possibilities and not knowing"
"dont know for sure how FE works as we are still working it out"
"FE has many ideas"

We may not be able to convince you of the GE model but you sure are convincing us with your lack of proof and inconsistency with other FE believers
That's the problem with inconstancy in a debate or argument. It makes the stories look made up

And since you are unable to prove any of your theories and us (according to your belief) how is your argument more reliable?

This post was edited by kai_jph on Nov 3 2017 01:46pm
Member
Posts: 21,556
Joined: Jul 3 2011
Gold: 56,000.69
#575
Nov 3 2017 01:41pm
The real question is dat ass round or flat?
Member
Posts: 23,832
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
#576
Nov 3 2017 02:00pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 3 2017 09:16pm)
After you prove the spinning ball rocket - we both experience the world as flat so the burden of proof is on you to prove its not flat.


You and Chivas proposed the FE theory. Its your job to prove it.

If the earth was a globe we would experience it as flat due to the massive size difference
In the GE model the curvature is believed to be 7.98 inches per mile. If that were true you really think humans would experience or feel that curvature?

lets take the sun "setting effect" in the evening for the FE

Chivas proposed this theory
Quote (ChivasRegal @ Sep 26 2017 02:02pm)
this is how I know you don't truly understand the law of perspective and convergence.
that other link didn't work btw
the sun isn't setting over the horizon. the sun is still in the sky and just reached the vanishing point (converged). It reached the limit of human vision until the sun is no longer visible, and then shortly after, the light radius from the sun is no longer visible to the human eye and we see night time


You agree with this?

This post was edited by kai_jph on Nov 3 2017 02:00pm
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#577
Nov 3 2017 02:37pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Nov 3 2017 09:31am)
Says the guy whose belief in FE is due to belief in a particular sky pixie.

Prove table or GTFO


not my job to prove Flat Earth to a guy who cant prove were on a spinning ball rocket but expects everyone to believe it

burden of proof is on you till you do you're just a trolling beta wit
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#578
Nov 3 2017 02:46pm
Quote (kai_jph @ Nov 3 2017 10:00am)
You and Chivas proposed the FE theory. Its your job to prove it.

If the earth was a globe we would experience it as flat due to the massive size difference
In the GE model the curvature is believed to be 7.98 inches per mile. If that were true you really think humans would experience or feel that curvature?

lets take the sun "setting effect" in the evening for the FE

Chivas proposed this theory


You agree with this?


Well first of you need to prove we are on a spinning ball rocket - you clearly expect people to believe it - so burden of proof is on you.

Second - about the sun setting - yes because of perspective and convergence, also i'd add atmospheric lensing and the perspective matrix.
None of which you seem to understand or have the first clue about, so not my problem you suffer from a learning disability, get a tutor
Member
Posts: 32,103
Joined: Dec 29 2009
Gold: 0.00
#579
Nov 3 2017 02:51pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Nov 3 2017 03:37pm)
not my job to prove Flat Earth to a guy who cant prove were on a spinning ball rocket but expects everyone to believe it

burden of proof is on you till you do you're just a trolling beta wit


No. You aren't getting away with this shit. The whole point of this thread is that "Globe Earth is a lie". You've taken this same position in this thread. Ergo, burden of proof is on YOU.

YOU PROVE TABLE, or GTFO.
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
#580
Nov 3 2017 02:57pm
Quote (Surfpunk @ Nov 3 2017 10:51am)
No. You aren't getting away with this shit. The whole point of this thread is that "Globe Earth is a lie". You've taken this same position in this thread. Ergo, burden of proof is on YOU.

YOU PROVE TABLE, or GTFO.


you're just parroting me - now prove the spinning ball rocket earth or dont expect people to believe it

why are you dodging and trolling?

If you cant prove it to me, dont expect me to believe your Ball shite

also get a life beta

https://youtu.be/s2__mn6f3l4
Go Back To General Chat Topic List
Prev156575859601933Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll

© 2003-2026 d2jsp  Contact