if science cant explain you then by definition your a supernatural creature and hard evidence for a creator. thats why evolution "macro" is defended so bitterly
when science become religion
"We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism... We cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door."
-Richard Lewontin




arrogance of 'atheism

try again

when you find out your a religious kook

"We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdity of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravagant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstantiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism... We cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door."
-Richard Lewontin

bump great thread it must be bumoped daily

Bump you daily

Thanks and God bless.

Thanks and God bless.

jesus tapdancing christ this thread is still open

I don't think Panspermia is the mainstream position and I'm pretty sure the researchers who subscribe to it just think that abiogenesis occurred elsewhere





What exactly do you need explained to you about evolution? Do you not understand the general concepts and processes involved? Are you not aware of the evidence supporting it?

Also you're misrepresenting that quote. The RNA world hypothesis was not abandoned, a specific paper purporting to provide evidence for the RNA world hypothesis was retracted by the authors after another researcher failed to replicate their results and called them out on their misinterpretation of the data. Is this supposed to reduce my confidence in mainstream scientific support for evolution?



No, hard evidence is hard evidence. If science can't currently explain everything about how life came into existence then all this is hard evidence for is the fact that we don't completely understand how life came into existence. Also, Retarded quote. Organised religions like Christianity are the ultimate "unsubstantiated just-so stories", if you honestly think that belief in evolution requires comparable levels of levels of faith/trust then you are either not honest with yourself or lacking in any understanding of the scientific method

and please for the love of god learn to use the quote function properly, it's really not hard to figure out

that gif bolster your confidence

i didnt say anyone said it was abandoned thats typical of a lying monkey man people making up chit like they made up chit in the "RNA world hypothesis"

" If science can't currently explain everything about how life came into existence then all this is hard evidence for is the fact that we don't completely understand how life came into existence. "
ah, nice admission