its denser than the false vacuum so they both fall downward


damn that was really hard to solve.


are you going to say like that one guy did " yeah but what force is it " oh gawd

False vacuum? Even if the vacuum was supposedly false, a "false vacuum" doesn't explain the difference in rates of fall. If density is the "driving force", the bowling ball would still fall faster in a vacuum.

density isn't a force bro what are you saying.


whats the force that let go of either one of them in the first place? lmao probably the same force that broguht it up there and then dropped its dense ass

the force that let go of them?
you didn't notice the machine they built that lifted the ball and feathers?

thats the force im questioning you about


you didn't notice that force

why don't u name that one anti gravity if the other force is gravity

Dodge.

And I'm not calling density a force. That was a euphemism to show a point. If density (and the differences thereof) is the reason objects fall through a medium, then it shouldn't matter if the bowling ball and feather were falling through air or a vacuum. The bowling ball would still fall faster. And yet it doesn't. You can't explain that (at least, not without resorting to reductio ad absurdum).

yes i can bro thats absolutely garbage.




they fall at the same rate because their both denser than that fucking medium AIR.

they hit the "bottom" because its so soon, if they were able to settle in their mediums of denisty they would seemingly float in layers. but instead they both just crashed to the floor.

what the fuck are you seriously saying man

oh my gawwwd this is great



This post was edited by eMptyBox on Jan 13 2018 08:50am

Wait, wait, wait....are you seriously saying that a bowling ball and feathers are the same density as each other? Because that's what your "argument" says.

are you a water head? assuming water falls from gravity...