Sigh, mission pushed back...

nice assumption based on what you were told in grade 2, however carbon dating them has revealed they are only 65,000 years old

normally dino bones aren't even carbon dated cause it would reveal this flawed thinking you suffer from





Nice how you quote yourself and then reply to it

#SantaraTalksToHimself

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 11 2018 06:14pm

you guys docking or launching?

Go educate yourself.

https://naturalhistory.si.edu/exhibits/backyard-dinosaurs/questions-answers.cfm?know=a24

Your neck is fatter and hairier than mine, not to mention covered in grey, under those dead, soulless, angry eyes.

-e

What's your hatred with fat people anyway?

What, your dad was fat and beat you? or was it something else?

Were you a fat child or something?

-e2

In any case, being fat doesn't make someone stupid, being stupid is as stupid does.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Jan 11 2018 06:18pm

sorry but they found blood cells in dino bones

blood doesn't take 65 million years to decompose

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur-shocker-115306469/

inb4 ridiculous iron excuse




no, I was never fat, i actually dont care if someone is overweight but your neck is clearly fatter than your head

and just noticed that you are quite sensitive about it

plus you're like OMG he doesn't believe in the consensus and the consensus is not overweight still so i just like to point out your own hypocrisy.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Jan 11 2018 06:26pm

Your source said the bone was 68 million years old.

#CardArguesCard

well the opinion of an astrobiologist is not credible in my opinion - there like an astro priest with a story to sell

the issue is that they are finding collagen and live tissue in supposedly 65 m year old Dino bones and the story doesn't add up

#SantaraAutoBelievesAstroBiologist

nice appeal to a fake authority to make yet another strawman assertion

What ridiculous position am I trying to project onto flat earthers? The fact that a periscope would see the entire ocean on a flat earth is MY position. I'm not projecting it onto anyone, I'm owning it as my own. I hereby assert that if the earth was flat, a periscope would see the entire ocean. This has nothing to do with flat earthers, except for their belief that the earth is flat.

I already told you what the horizon is a result of, and I can easily prove it with any spherical object. So can anybody.

So.... she's credible for finding soft tissue, but she's not credible for dating?

Cake.

Eat cake.