I don't see any parentheses, therefore the answer is 26. The last 2 is the only one being affected by the 0 since you must calculate the multilications first in the equation.

That's how I learned it, and I refuse to get told that my entire life was a lie.

your entire life was a sarcastic remark

This post was edited by Eep on Oct 16 2011 10:21pm

can't tell if srs..

Who was your math teacher? Parenthesis would indicate you do that part of the math problem first. Since it does lack parenthesis you start at the beginning of the equation and work your way through. If it were to do (2+1) +(1+1) x 0 You would work from inside the parenthesis then multiply the answer to finish the equation. But the answer to my example would still ofc be 0. Or I just googled it and he could be right and I have been taught the wrong math my entire life? Good. I was always taught that anything ending in 0 would = 0. Or that if 0 was in an equation with n o parenthesis it would =0.




this

This post was edited by Chenoah on Oct 16 2011 11:09pm

Wait hold on, I misread the entire thing as "2 x 2 x 2....2 x 0," not "2 + 2 + 2....2 x 0."

2 + 2....2 x 0 would yield 26 due to the order of operations.

2x2...x0 would yield 0 also due to the order of operations.

try taking a math course above intermediate algebra, champ

lmfao you do know it's not zero, right?

BIDMAS brackets indices division multiplication addition subtraction

first you multiply by zero, so you get 0. Then you add/subract all the two's. It's impossible to get 0.

I do believe YOU don't know basic math good sir!

Yes we have established I am a noob. Ty.

lololol

Actually you're retarded. The answer is 26, not 0.

O wait, it's been established. Lol.

This post was edited by 0nebl00b on Oct 17 2011 06:15am