d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > Globe Earth
Prev141424344451933Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 63,908
Joined: Jun 26 2009
Gold: 169.70
Oct 18 2017 03:17am
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 18 2017 05:59pm)
Why then can i use a 2d figure to represent parallax perfectly, but your convergence magically doesn't work that way? Because it's literally the exact same reason for both observations.


show me the example you are trying to describe so I can once again correct you (*flies the spoon into his mouth using the woosh sound effects...)
Member
Posts: 2,837
Joined: Feb 17 2017
Gold: 421.95
Warn: 10%
Oct 18 2017 03:17am
The earth is round.
Member
Posts: 41,466
Joined: Jul 9 2005
Gold: 4,673.69
Oct 18 2017 03:44am
Quote (Thor123422 @ 18 Oct 2017 10:29)
Why then can i use a 2d figure to represent parallax perfectly, but your convergence magically doesn't work that way? Because it's literally the exact same reason for both observations.


:rofl:
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 18 2017 12:18pm



I'm teaching a friend's lab, and I'm bored, so I went ahead and made a figure to show you why parallax and what you call "perspective" are literally the exact same thing. The only difference is that parallax involves a moving object, while convergence involves one continuous object moving away from you.


I used a stationary observer for parallax since it's easier to draw, but the same thing can be demonstrated by moving the eye as moving the object, because it is the same relative motion.

This post was edited by Thor123422 on Oct 18 2017 12:26pm
Member
Posts: 23,832
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
Oct 18 2017 12:42pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 18 2017 08:18pm)
https://i.imgur.com/qGwyK3y.png


I'm teaching a friend's lab, and I'm bored, so I went ahead and made a figure to show you why parallax and what you call "perspective" are literally the exact same thing. The only difference is that parallax involves a moving object, while convergence involves one continuous object moving away from you.


I used a stationary observer for parallax since it's easier to draw, but the same thing can be demonstrated by moving the eye as moving the object, because it is the same relative motion.


...except chivas rewrote the matrix, so these laws dont apply in his "FE world"
Member
Posts: 64,763
Joined: Oct 25 2006
Gold: 0.00
Oct 18 2017 01:04pm
Quote (kai_jph @ Oct 18 2017 12:42pm)
...except chivas rewrote the matrix, so these laws dont apply in his "FE world"


His parallax thing really just shows how little he understands about his own models.
Member
Posts: 23,832
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
Oct 18 2017 01:09pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 18 2017 09:04pm)
His parallax thing really just shows how little he understands about his own models.


Agree .
Sad thing is most of us understand it more than him even though we disagree
Member
Posts: 63,908
Joined: Jun 26 2009
Gold: 169.70
Oct 18 2017 11:52pm
Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 19 2017 03:48am)
https://i.imgur.com/qGwyK3y.png


I'm teaching a friend's lab, and I'm bored, so I went ahead and made a figure to show you why parallax and what you call "perspective" are literally the exact same thing. The only difference is that parallax involves a moving object, while convergence involves one continuous object moving away from you.


I used a stationary observer for parallax since it's easier to draw, but the same thing can be demonstrated by moving the eye as moving the object, because it is the same relative motion.


someone doesn't understand parallax......try again
Member
Posts: 23,832
Joined: Jun 18 2014
Gold: 6.69
Oct 19 2017 12:30am
Quote (ChivasRegal @ Oct 19 2017 07:52am)
someone doesn't understand parallax......try again


Whats not to under stand


Freom tfes
https://wiki.tfes.org/Shifting_Constellations

This change in distance compared to RE figures is due to an adjusted astronomical parallax on a Flat Earth. The angle of stellar parallax changes, as it does with the sun, when the earth is assumed to be a flat surface. By plane trigonometry, in special connection with carefully measured base lines, Dr. Samuel Birley Rowbotham has demonstrated and placed beyond all power of doubt that the sun, moon, stars are all within a distance of a few thousand miles from the surface of the earth.

That opens a new question.
How is travel to the moon impossible since it's believed to be close below the globe?

This post was edited by kai_jph on Oct 19 2017 12:47am
Member
Posts: 41,466
Joined: Jul 9 2005
Gold: 4,673.69
Oct 19 2017 01:10am
Quote (kai_jph @ 19 Oct 2017 08:30)
Whats not to under stand
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/10/Parallax_Example.svg/300px-Parallax_Example.svg.png

Freom tfes
https://wiki.tfes.org/Shifting_Constellations

This change in distance compared to RE figures is due to an adjusted astronomical parallax on a Flat Earth. The angle of stellar parallax changes, as it does with the sun, when the earth is assumed to be a flat surface. By plane trigonometry, in special connection with carefully measured base lines, Dr. Samuel Birley Rowbotham has demonstrated and placed beyond all power of doubt that the sun, moon, stars are all within a distance of a few thousand miles from the surface of the earth.

That opens a new question.
How is travel to the moon impossible since it's believed to be close below the globe?


Flat Earth confirmed! :o :D
Go Back To General Chat Topic List
Prev141424344451933Next
Add Reply New Topic New Poll