Quote (thesnipa @ Dec 28 2017 11:43am)
proving i posted something =/= proving im mad
i enjoyed those conversations, i enjoy this conversation. you're just a play thing, and i enjoy playing with you.
at least i dont base the shape of the earth off of your perceived emotions, that would be :wacko:
If you just believe stuff because it makes other people "mad", people you dont even know, you are a spineless fool
you probably dont even remember but we were just arguing about whether Nasa photos were "proof" and you raged liked a little whiny bitch
quite like you are now
And also i dont care if you believe in FE, you're here to rage about the fact i dont believe in the spinning ball faith anymore
and justify treating me like a leper in your socially constructed relegion
so like you its pretty pathetic once you examine it honestly, which clearly you cant do
Quote (Santara @ Dec 28 2017 11:52am)
It's an awfully good approximation though. Cuz GRAVITY and protons.
That's because I use proper scientific terms, and you make up your own.
I don't care if you don't believe in atoms. That doesn't mean they don't exist. Electron microscopes are a thing. They can see individual atoms in them.
i posted pics - your concept of an atom looks nothing like a picture through an electron microscope
i think that's an issue, you probably only care what TV dinner to microwave tonight.
This post was edited by card_sultan on Dec 28 2017 04:04pm