This is basically your idiocy summarized in one post. Good job.

What is your proof that the Nature of reality is proved by Math?

or do you just need to use ad hoc ad hom pointless insults to serve as a deflection to your not knowing how else to respond?



Keep failing muppet

- omfg you copied my word

#plagurizer

This post was edited by card_sultan on Dec 27 2017 01:16pm

Remember when people posted the math to explain how the slinky appeared to momentarily defy gravity and the only way for you to ( in your mind anyways) exit the conversation was to double down on stupid and insist the slinky wasn’t a spring?
Should have just denied math explains things, much easier exit strategy really.
Also is your first sentence English or just English word salad

Gravity is just an ad hoc excuse you cling to and justify your Athiest space fantasies, you're never leaving this terrafirma plane, get over it.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Dec 27 2017 01:20pm

because you posted a video of a slinky falling in slow motion from the top down first as proof of a flat earth. A slinky being a spring (and therefore having internal tension that overcomes gravity) is proof neither of a flat or round earth. neither gravity nor density/buoyancy. you posted a video that proved nothing, then spent weeks wishing you hadnt as you were humiliated over and over on the topic.

you do that a lot, post something you think is proof, but then refuse to take the easy way out when its explained its neither proof nor disproof of anything. a lot of the things you post would work on a flat or round earth, your habit of clinging to them like a lifesaver in rough chop is both predictable and cute. keep it up. if only you knew your model as well as i do, you'd be worth actually debating.




remco6 Used double slap, it hit 237 times.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 27 2017 01:21pm

a slinky isn't a spring, because it holds no tension in its unmanipulated state

but why you need to deflect with the fact you were humiliated by agreeing with Nasa and not providing the mechanism behind your magic force?

keep failing™

This post was edited by card_sultan on Dec 27 2017 01:26pm

Potential explanation for why things fall: gravity

Potential explanation for why things fall: buoyancy/density

Reason a slinky doesnt fall until the top half meats the bottom half: internal tension

Physics models where a slinky wouldnt fall until the internal tension is eliminated: both


you'll of course deny this, once again spitting on an easy out so that you can try (and fail) to use a NASA source to disprove something its not applicable to.

like i said, keep it up. you're fish in a barrel kid.



thats only 1 type of spring. lots of things have multiple types, such as humans. we're both humans and yet you have the brain of a common carp.

http://www.instructables.com/id/Types-of--Mechanical-Springs/

i suppose they were paid by nasa to make that site just to "prove gravity", right? RIGHT? RIGHT?



would ya lookie there

This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 27 2017 01:28pm

Oh look card assigning beliefs to people without any basis again, shocking




Lol
Appropriate attack for the specific opponent. Sad really that a slap is enough.

"a slinky isn't a spring,"

oh lord here we go again..

So before you said slinkys prove gravity

and now your admitting that they dont

cause of a word you made up

holy crap internal tension applies to you, and please if you tried to shoot fish in a barrel you'd miss cause of that blind faith