Well If you ever get around to reading the results of those 20+ studies in that one i linked, associated with several countries, which debunks the entire vaccines linked to autism argument.

post a screenshot of you responding with a middle finger plz, with todays newspaper held up..... or gtfo

it would help if you linked the actual study instead of a subscription page

Don't project your shit onto me.




oh derp sec.

https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/48/4/456/284219

Sorry about that, not sure how that happened.

-e

Sub not required.

-e 2

Some of the studies you linked are not about autism.

Don't misunderstand, I am open to the possibility that some vaccines can have negative effects in some people.

I am saying that Autism is not one of those effects.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Dec 23 2017 08:57am

It's hard to isolate one cause, that is why statistics are so good. just look at the number of autistic kids before/after vaccination campaign. take any country you want.
Again, that is one subject I do not really wish to argue with americans. from last news you are still eating chloric chicken and so many others chemical shits that we do not even allow in EU food (and we allow a lot of shits, still)
If you try to touch an industry it will always leads you public embarassment, if it isnt enough they might kill you if you're a real treat to their business.
now that's just about general medecine, another ex would be chimiotherapy which was suspected from long to be very harmful aswell.
I know few countries who decided to use it as less as possible and always privileging alternative treatments.
I just dont believe we are enough documented right now to understand everything about human immunity system and health. some things takes time to be proven.
If you believe vaccines are harmess for your body, just drink 1 liter of aluminum salt and tell us how you do.
it's like this stupid lobbist from monsanto who refused on live to drink glyphosate, right after saying you could drink it without any risk lmao

This post was edited by Melatonina on Dec 23 2017 09:07am

I had a look at the thimerosal section of the study you linked (I agree the mmr and overload theory aren't credible enough to discuss) and it seems to be based on the studies critiqued in the 5th link of my post, so that might be worth reading for you.

This post was edited by Condemn on Dec 23 2017 09:12am

Yeah i been reading them off and on, some of the dates have me confused. Like old studies with fresh dates.

Not sure, gonna keep reading here and there.

Flat earth = real earth