d2jsp
Log InRegister
d2jsp Forums > Off-Topic > General Chat > : How To Earth - A Card_sultan Special > Part 2
Prev1342343344345346350Next
Closed New Topic New Poll
Member
Posts: 63,908
Joined: Jun 26 2009
Gold: 169.70
Sep 17 2017 02:28pm
Quote (remco6 @ Sep 18 2017 04:58am)
You argued that the force experienced on a merygoround and the apparent lack of the same force on a person on the edge of of supposedly globe proves that it can't be a spinning globe because there is no force throwing us off corect?

If so do you agree that there is a formula we can use to determine the force experienced on the merrygoround?


we can agree that we can actually SEE the merry-go-round spinning......we can't SEE the earth spinning, nor can we FEEL the earth moving.
Member
Posts: 14,319
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 7,271.48
Sep 17 2017 02:36pm
Quote (ChivasRegal @ Sep 17 2017 02:28pm)
we can agree that we can actually SEE the merry-go-round spinning......we can't SEE the earth spinning, nor can we FEEL the earth moving.



You can't see nuclear radiation either. What would you determine the cause of radiation sickness to be if you can't see it, demons? Gods random anger at an unworthy individual?
Or maybe scientific explanations of realities that can't be observed by the naked eye?

Can we come-up with a formula to predict the force experienced in a small merrygoround vs a larger one, or in a vehicle going around a sharp curve vs a larger more gradual one, or either of the above but at different speeds?

This post was edited by remco6 on Sep 17 2017 02:40pm
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Sep 17 2017 05:01pm
Quote (remco6 @ Sep 17 2017 09:28am)
You argued that the force experienced on a merygoround and the apparent lack of the same force on a person on the edge of of supposedly globe proves that it can't be a spinning globe because there is no force throwing us off corect?

If so do you agree that there is a formula we can use to determine the force experienced on the merrygoround?


I like how you assume stuff I dont say. First off the force would not be the same but it should be at least measurable. Electronic Accelerometers that have been shown to be sensitive enough to register a 360° rotation in 7 days, cannot detect the supposed 360° rotation of the Earth.

If you have actual proof of how to detect and measure the rotation of Earth, please show it so we can all do it for ourselves. The spin doctored word of pys-enctists just doesn't cut the mustard anymore.
Member
Posts: 30,432
Joined: Dec 28 2010
Gold: 134.69
Sep 17 2017 05:19pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Sep 17 2017 06:01pm)
I like how you assume stuff I dont say. First off the force would not be the same but it should be at least measurable. Electronic Accelerometers that have been shown to be sensitive enough to register a 360° rotation in 7 days, cannot detect the supposed 360° rotation of the Earth.

If you have actual proof of how to detect and measure the rotation of Earth, please show it so we can all do it for ourselves. The spin doctored word of pys-enctists just doesn't cut the mustard anymore.


I wouldnt say its proof but the golden gate bridge having supports that arent paralell look pretty weird if the flat earth is literally pulling them apart, must cost alot in road maintenance

E: suspension bridge might not be the best example, just dont have any solid stone bridges with support pillars in my mind atm

This post was edited by dude_927 on Sep 17 2017 05:21pm
Member
Posts: 14,319
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 7,271.48
Sep 17 2017 06:18pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Sep 17 2017 05:01pm)
I like how you assume stuff I dont say. First off the force would not be the same but it should be at least measurable. Electronic Accelerometers that have been shown to be sensitive enough to register a 360° rotation in 7 days, cannot detect the supposed 360° rotation of the Earth.

If you have actual proof of how to detect and measure the rotation of Earth, please show it so we can all do it for ourselves. The spin doctored word of pys-enctists just doesn't cut the mustard anymore.


well you did reply to a meme that insinuated what I just said with the word exactly.

This post was edited by remco6 on Sep 17 2017 06:18pm
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Sep 17 2017 06:26pm
Quote (remco6 @ Sep 17 2017 02:18pm)
well you did reply to a meme that insinuated what I just said with the word exactly.


Proof that I meant exactly to the math and not that the centrifugal force is just imaginary?

Troll all you want but you've got no real proof the Earth is a globe, no one can debunk Flat Earth as its way older than the spinning ball model and has more truth.
Face it, all you can do is parrot the rhetoric from spin doctors and troll anyone who doesn't conform so unless you got actual evidence - your posts are worthless.
Member
Posts: 16,621
Joined: Jan 7 2017
Gold: 90.58
Sep 17 2017 06:37pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Sep 17 2017 04:26pm)
Proof that I meant exactly to the math and not that the centrifugal force is just imaginary?

Troll all you want but you've got no real proof the Earth is a globe, no one can debunk Flat Earth as its way older than the spinning ball model and has more truth.
Face it, all you can do is parrot the rhetoric from spin doctors and troll anyone who doesn't conform so unless you got actual evidence - your posts are worthless.


LMAO
Member
Posts: 14,319
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 7,271.48
Sep 17 2017 06:53pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Sep 17 2017 06:26pm)
Proof that I meant exactly to the math and not that the centrifugal force is just imaginary?


Well mainly the fact that there is no math in the meme. That and the fact you ignored my query as to if you accepted a possible method of calculating the forces involved in each scenario and comparing them. The meme is obviously stupid, why would a force that is ~1000 times stronger than the one it's being compared be expected to be as noticeable?
Member
Posts: 63,097
Joined: Jan 11 2005
Gold: 9,765.00
Warn: 60%
Sep 17 2017 09:01pm
Quote (remco6 @ Sep 17 2017 02:53pm)
Well mainly the fact that there is no math in the meme. That and the fact you ignored my query as to if you accepted a possible method of calculating the forces involved in each scenario and comparing them. The meme is obviously stupid, why would a force that is ~1000 times stronger than the one it's being compared be expected to be as noticeable?


Keep trolling to avoid the fact that you need to show actual proof for your spin doctored claim that the Earth is spinning.

This post was edited by card_sultan on Sep 17 2017 09:04pm
Member
Posts: 14,319
Joined: Jun 19 2010
Gold: 7,271.48
Sep 17 2017 09:18pm
Quote (card_sultan @ Sep 17 2017 09:01pm)
Keep trolling to avoid the fact that you need to show actual proof for your spin doctored claim that the Earth is spinning.



Keep dodging to avoid being exposed to any information that could cause you to question your ignorance.
Go Back To General Chat Topic List
Prev1342343344345346350Next
Closed New Topic New Poll