changes in magnetism, electricity and temperature vibrational density affect the buoyancy of the object as compared to the changes in magnetism, electricity and temperature pressure and density the object exists in





I can provide hundred of links were well established jsp'ers that have instigated this flame and rage before i returned the favor, none of these people ever received a warn, so cherry picking information is not helpful.

Why aren't all these people posting useless emoticons of off topic spam warned?

This post was edited by card_sultan on Mar 27 2017 09:32am

The time he posted a source that directly countered his theory without even knowing it was bad, but claiming a slinky isn't a spring because it can't lift a garage door really takes the cake for me.

I just wonder if he's gotten help yet.

Only someone who believes in Bigfoot would put faith in a picture when the text never said that the plasmasphere can only exist on a ball earth, Chalk it up to your bad reading comprehension and need to strawman.
Still waiting for your 3d drawings to explaining perspective on a sphere, dodge more.

With your logic , Ewoks are real cause this is a real picture.

i'm not sure if you've not noticed but i haven't really been bothering with you since that source fail. this thread in which you followed this path:

1. misunderstood the cause of the slinky video
2. challenged people to prove that a slinky is a spring
3. learned there are two types of springs then used a cornell source that served literally zero purpose for the context (it was semantics not actually addressing the physical shape at play)
4. challenged others to find an application where a slinky can replace an existing spring, otherwise it's not a spring
5. claimed it can't be a spring because it can't lift a door

pretty much confirms you're either totally off the rocker or trolling too much to be bothered with. Just the thought of having to walk you through a 3d perspective drawing and then make tweeks based off of your gripes with it as a result of it disproving you gives me the willies.

this whole spring debacle shows why its not worth the bother.

want a fresh start it's easy repeat after me, or simply quote this line and say "i agree":

"I misunderstood the slinky example, a slinky is a spring and this is what is at play rather than gravity or any source of density or any other flat earth theory. This neither proves nor disproves either theory and the effect is actually caused by the internal tension caused by stretching out the slinky, as would happen with any spring, because a slinky is a spring. Again, this neither proves or disproves either theory about the shape of the earth or any sense of density or gravity. The internal tension of the spring is the only force that is applicable in that effect."

admit that and maybe i'll bite again, otherwise i'm just gonna stop in from time to time to point out blatant bullshit. just offering you a chance to look a bit more sane without actually having it affect your theory, we both know that's why u can't admit a slinky is a spring, because you think it disproves you. truth is u just misread the whole thing.

undoubetebly you'll just try to copy certain lines in this post but try to turn it around on me by calling my post a "troll" or saying i'm the one not understanding. then you'll follow on some strawman paths u think make your posts readable. we'll see tho.

This post was edited by thesnipa on Mar 27 2017 10:28am

No proof so everything he says is false

Lmaooo gg

So Cornell was paid by Nasa and Smithsonian Astronomy to tell people slinkys are springs and you think that's a credible source? Id call it a huge red flag and it proves its Propaganda made to look like "science".

Springs have a useful function, Slinkys do not - that alone ought to tell you they are not the same thing. You need Nasa to tell you how to think? Really? Well you probably do, sad.

an item's function has nothing to do with it's shape, which is what a spring is defined by, not it's application. also a slinky DOES have a function. i'm not sure why you felt this was your best avenue to go down, a slinky does have a function as a spring, that's kind of it's whole existence. when you push it down the stairs it is it's spring nature that causes it to act the way it does.

did you not know that?