omg it's even worse than i thought

we are in the era of teleportation quantic and this moron says that

Yeah. Somebody should tell him you do experiments that confirm photons in any gen chem class, but then again you do the same with gravity in physics 101 so....

Remember that time when u posted proof of water sticking to a spinning ball?

neither do I...

Remember that time when you explained Jupiter's spin?

Neither do I...

Never spun a wet tennis ball? Spin at 1 revolution a day and see if the water flies off.

You can calculate centrifugal force pretty easily, but I know you're allergic to work.

why work when youtube does it for you ?

Sadly that's not really a good example, since the water stays on the ball due to adhesion, not gravity.

ok pokemon kid t4i. 11km height of water in marianne's, all this due to adhesion

This post was edited by Melatonina on Dec 18 2017 02:59am

Experiments - wow - great story.

We already discussed how the Cavendish Experiment is just a trick of polarity from the fact they need to used lead/metallic objects

but i still deny that either has any affect toward explaining why your reasoning behind thinking that perspective has nothing to do with optics.

Perhaps you would be so kind as to teach me why see the horizon on Globe Earth?



How can a flat light source appear as a spinning ball?

https://youtu.be/XQoi2J28vHM?t=1740



Size matters - the earth is 8 billion times bigger - therefore your comparison is just a logical fallacy

This post was edited by card_sultan on Dec 18 2017 03:04am

Who said it's a flat light source?



I did not say that. All I'm saying is that water stays on earth due to a different phenomenon than what causes water to stay on a tennis ball. If card_sultan knew his shit, he would have called you out on that and he'd be right.