More importantly, when?

you won't find anything, all the CGI work is dont out of House



Elon knows its all fake. Did you see the car he launched to space? HaHA, They even included the rendering shot in the cgi package that was released and some people still bought it. At the press conference he remarked - "It looks so fake - it must be real" The State is faking space for your benefit, to keep the masses sedated with drugs and cartoons so they can steal your money. Elon just wants his slice of pie - even though NOAA slapped him with a big fine and hes not allowed to show any space footage anymore for trying to pull off that stunt. Is he in the Illuminati , IDK, ask him.

Do you have a link?

search for the SpaceX Falcon launch live 6-2-2018 press conference where Elon musk spoke for about an hour

It's strange this was even questioned in the first place.

A reflector was placed in the surface of the moon which you can bounce a laser off to measure the distance to the earth. Have been able to do that since July 21st 1969.

You can even do it yourself with the right gear.

Also the lunar reconnaissance orbitor has mapped the surface to high resolution, and we can clearly see each landing site and footprints everywhere.

Basically to not beleive it happened you have to not read a single thing about the landings.

Or are someone who has a tendency to disregard actual science for stupid conspiracy theories.

InB4 stupid "astropriest"-style response.

This post was edited by Surfpunk on Jul 25 2019 02:21pm

I've yet to meet one of those people, but I know they exist.

Its so funny when people think they have "actual Science" of their Space Fantasy. Ask him what the Independent variable was in the experiment that proved gravity or an example of a vacuum existing without container, or to explain how they figured out the Cosmological constant? All the have are theory tales and abstract assumptions. Whip-t-do.

You are comparing things relying on mathematical proofs to a physical act of going to and landing on the moon. One pretty much anyone can understand, the other is only for people who can interpret the equations.

It's not "actual science". You can interact with someone they left behind on 1969.there's no arguing that, it's fact lol.

So how do explain that Harvard was doing this same test in 1962, well before any reflector was put on the moon?

And considering the refraction due to the medium changes, temperature fluctuation and distance traveled - I hardly think this is much more that a machine that goes bing
https://youtu.be/arCITMfxvEc