Light from the sun is NEAR parallel. We've been over that, and you ignored it then too. Light from the sun only APPEARS crepuscular to an individual observer - one of the real world instances of actual PERSPECTIVE, that you ignore.

Step 1: Spend years claiming that even if someone was 10 miles up they couldn't see curve, claim that if any 10 mile photos exist they are fish eye lenses. because even if u were that high, you'd "see no curve". Create an entire earth model that suggests that if the earth was curved u could see it from the ground, and therefore extreme elevation doesnt matter.

Step 2: Tell someone they haven't been 10 miles up, so how could they even know if the earth has curve other than photos.

Step 3: claim airplanes fly at 10 miles up in a vain attempt to dig yourself out of a hole.

Step 4: profit?



so you have a source for commercial airlines regularly flying that high right?

This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 15 2017 04:54pm

nope

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/travel-truths/why-do-planes-fly-so-high-feet/

The “sweet spot” of flying is regarded as between 35,000 and 42,000 feet

and planes do fly higher

think the concorde was at 70k feet

and spy planes are at 70-100k feet



so you just believed a blatant lie, if hes wrong here - hes wrong with everything




near parallel is not parallel



This post was edited by card_sultan on Dec 15 2017 05:01pm

ahahahahahahahahahah another source fail. every time i challenge u to find a source u dont read it all.

even at 42k that's 8 miles. not 10.

as if you'd let anyone off the hook for missing by a mile, oops i mean two....



that's fucking rich coming from Mr makes a mistake daily. what if say someone said 10 miles but meant 8?

This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 15 2017 05:03pm

10 miles is 52,800 feet. 33,000 is closer to "35,000-42,000" than 52,800.

Near enough as to be indistinguishable to a localized observer.

What you conveniently DODGED was the fact that an observer on the surface in my picture looking up at the sunlight would see the image you posted. Amazing how parallel rays of light can look crepuscular.

so you have proof that airplane never fly higher than 42,000 feet

gg liar and troller

close only counts in horseshoes and grenades and liars who claim claim 33k feet when a simple google search proves them wrong

troll more




https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travelbuzz/1397966-do-planes-fly-above-40-000-feet.html


"The flight Attendant said "they flew at 59k feet days earlier to avoid some big storms".


smashed

This post was edited by card_sultan on Dec 15 2017 05:07pm

Why would i have proof of something I'm not claiming. burden of proof is on you, you made the claim.

You're ignorring the part that matters, you drew a distinction between, "been more than 10 miles above this terrestrial plane" and "you were shown a picture". which implies that if someone was 10 miles up they'd see the curvature, if the earth was round. you've argued for years that the elevation doesnt matter, now apparently it does, thus the distinction.



but hey what a few miles between friends anyways. its not like you claimed that you'd feel the curvature of the earth at one point. "where proof" is your next move.


LOL at u thinking the height of the plane was where u went wrong. u are always so far behind...

This post was edited by thesnipa on Dec 15 2017 05:10pm

A "simple Google search":

http://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=741859



Look at that, after they burn off the weight of the fuel they had early on in a flight, they continually climbed to higher altitudes. So really, 33,000 is GOING to be a cruising altitude for a while as they lighten the load so they can climb higher.



Don't go conflating the service ceiling with cruising altitude.

This post was edited by Santara on Dec 15 2017 05:12pm

What is amazing is how you tell people their eyes are lying when its just your mouth that is lying, its blatantly obvious curvert, to everyone but you.