Quote (Santara @ Mar 5 2017 12:11pm)

Um, you don't have a fucking model. You can't construct a comprehensive system that explains the observations of millions of people without getting your teeth kicked in on pretty much every front. Do you know what the fuck falsifiability is? Are you aware that your "model" depends upon a litany of unfalsifiable claims, like how an object 3000 miles over a flat Earth's surface isn't visible ALL the time? How do you rectify such an obvious shortcoming? It's God damned magic that we can't see something we can draw a direct line of sight to in your retard world. How about the claim that each and every single one of the thousands, if not millions of photos taken of the Earth's curvature are explained away with "THEY ARE HIDING THE TRUTH FROM US ALL" bullshit that can't POSSIBLY be substantiated. You're full of shit. Trying to pretend you're on the same level as I am regarding basic physics and general scientific thought is asinine.

Quote (ChivasRegal @ Mar 5 2017 12:30am)

when you have calmed down, come back and have another go at a rational response to the failed debunking ok.

Quote (AssButt @ Mar 4 2017 10:34pm)

What flat earthers don't realize is that you are the ones that need to do the debunking of the existing globe earth.

Quote (AssButt @ Mar 4 2017 11:38pm)

This is basically just a +1 thread. OP and any other flat earther are just trolls looking for responses.

Quote (xBx @ Mar 5 2017 12:39am)

i know, its just mind boggling how hardcore theyre taking it.


just bonerface it up and spam smileys!

Quote (AssButt @ Mar 4 2017 10:38pm)

This is basically just a +1 thread. OP and any other flat earther are just trolls looking for responses.

Quote (ChivasRegal @ Mar 4 2017 11:30pm)

when you have calmed down, come back and have another go at a rational response to the failed debunking ok.

Quote (death_knight @ Mar 5 2017 12:43am)

Possibly

While I know that the earth is round I still accept that my knowledge has been given to me (as in i have not done any or all calulation of oberservation to either to confim or deny)

There from my stance both flat and round are plausible simply because i have not personally completed the scientific method

It is the application of method that derives conclusion which may prove to be invalid

However purposing such an argument is not