ge

+1

flat earth is not a big enough issue that NDT will once again address it after a year+ of refusing to engage anyone who asked about it.

There will be a scheduled debate on JRE, i fully expect for the person he's debating to need to have terms corrected for him that he misuses. generally there's as much time in these debates explaining the basic tenants of each model as there is actual debate. I hope im wrong, and perhaps there is a prearranged list of topics to be debated and pre-researched to cut down on this. Otherwise it will just be NDT explaining what the opposition is misrepresenting more than actual debunking of either model.

This is what I'm talking about! It's just random words he heard somewhere that sound sciency! I swear he has no idea what at least half of them are even about, he just memorized the letters and the order they need to be arranged in to result in a word that's often used in a scientific context. He then uses these words at random and interchangeably.

right. like lets dissect what he has said there.




Particles of the EM spectrum are positively charged, and thus are magnetic. (this is why the earth is not roaster by the extreme radiation of the sun, the magnetic field protects it.)
Ever heard of the aurora borealis or the aurora australis?



What is an EM polarity feild? Define this please.

Why would it push "density" down?

Also, define density.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Dec 13 2017 10:46am

inb4 nonsense explanation and or dodge followed by or preceding random insult about indoctrination or brainwashed nasa cartoon puppetry.

This post was edited by Ep0ch on Dec 13 2017 10:46am

And the usual copy past spam

Plus one hawtie