Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 7 2017 01:11am)

If flat earth is true why are the same constellations observed in South America as Australia, but rotated?

Quote (ChivasRegal @ Oct 6 2017 07:16pm)

grab a dinner plate or paper plate and draw a big smiley face on it. Now stick the plate (smiley face showing) on the ceiling in ur living room or long hall way and look at it from one side of the room, now walk to the other side of the room and look up at the plate. what just happened?

did it just answer ur question?

Quote (Thor123422 @ Oct 7 2017 11:06am)

Doesn't answer the question.

In the flat earth you would be looking in entirely opposite directions if you looked "south" from Australia, as if you looked "south" from South America.

What you described does, however, work perfectly with a round Earth.



Oh sorry, maybe I should specify. If you look SOUTH both times, you see the same constelations. If you look North both times you see different constellations because the Earth is obscuring your vision, because the Earth is round.

Quote (ChivasRegal @ Oct 6 2017 09:11pm)

thanks for exposing yourself as being incredibly dense (a.k.a. dumb)

Quote (Santara @ Oct 6 2017 05:12pm)

What logic? There is none. Mother fucker was all like "gravity doesn't work under water." LMAO! He also acts like a perfectly still, perfectly straight rudder (bow and stern planes, really) will keep you going perfectly straight! Dude doesn't know shit about steering ships. I have PERSONALLY steered warships. With a GYROSCOPE! Yes, more forces act on a ship on the surface than do underwater, but they exist all the same. Helmsmen have to make CONSTANT tiny course corrections. It's so important to safe ship operations that they don't let any one person stand watch at the helm for more than an hour at a time unless they've managed to qualify as a master helmsman who's performing critical steering like during UNREP or sea & anchor detail. Your video acts as if there aren't wave forces or currents underwater.

Quote (kai_jph @ Oct 7 2017 04:06am)

Since we talking about the oceans, the Ice Wall theory came about to stop the oceans spilling off the edge if the flat earth model
(As per FES)


But since no proof to its existance exists and since you belief the dome over the flat earth to be impenetrable is the Ice Wall really needed in the FE model?

Quote (ChivasRegal @ Oct 7 2017 08:33am)

no proof of the ice wall you say?

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CZVO-jiWIAEQU2n.jpg

https://imgur.com/a/2jwgS

stop the denial please

Quote (ChivasRegal @ Oct 6 2017 06:11pm)

thanks for exposing yourself as being incredibly dense (a.k.a. dumb)

Quote (kai_jph @ Oct 7 2017 04:12pm)

From an image hosting site?

Those images only shows a small section of antarctica.
Doesn't provide any proof that its a wall surrounding the whole earth and not a continent

And what scientific reference do you have to prove the images' validity as a wall surrounding whole earth (outside youtube)?

The only person in denial is you

Quote (ChivasRegal @ Oct 7 2017 12:32am)

why do you never stop, think, and use some logic before asking ridiculous questions......what camera can fit 16,000+ km of ice wall into a single picture????